web analytics

Caroline Leavitt interviews Harriet Levin Millan...



Harriet Levin Millan talks about her profound novel-based-on-a-true-story, How Fast Can You Run, about a South Sudan refuge searching for the mother he was separated from when he was five.

“The best war novel told from a young boy’s perspective since Jerzy Kozinski’s The Painted Bird.”

—Nyoul Lueth Tong, author of There is a Country: New Writing from the New Country of South Sudan

Prepare to be amazed. When One Book, One Philadelphia asked author and Drexel University professor Harriet Levin Millan to choose ten of her undergraduate creative writing students to interview ten South Sudanese refugees for a special One Book writing project, she met Michael Majok Kuch, who became the subject of her novel. . Kuch survived the torching of his village in South Sudan, and was separated from his mother when he was only five. His quest to be reunited with her, and the plight of the refuge is both profound and moving. Thank you so much Harriet, for being here.

I always say every book starts with a yearning. What was yours?

My yearning was for Michael Majok Kuch, the S. Sudanese national, I based my novel on, to see his mother. They had been separated since Michael was five-years-old and their village was attacked in the middle of the night and they got separated. So by the time I met him, when he was a senior in college, he hadn’t seen her for nearly 22 years. [more…]

Share Button


  • The Vale of Cashmere

  • by Sean Elder

    green forest

    This story first appeared in Voice from the Planet, FREE from March 30 – April 3, 2017 at Amazon Kindle US, and Kindle UK among others.


    Truth was, she used to be able to organize her thoughts, until Floyd retired. Now he was always hanging around talking to her, asking what she was doing. Every time he went out, which wasn’t often enough for her taste, he would ask her if she needed anything and then look angry if she did. Sometimes he’d look angry if she didn’t. Now she looked for errands for him, just to get a moment’s peace. When she sent him off for milk this morning she could have lived without it. But she couldn’t have stood listening to him complain about the bus ride to Atlantic City before it happened, not non-stop for the next two hours.

    “You’re creating your future,” she told him. “Whatever you’re thinking and feeling, that becomes your reality.”

    “Don’t give me that shit,” he’d said, putting on his coat and hat. He had been wearing that same damned hat with the stingy brim so long it had come back in style.

    “It’s the law of attraction,” she’d continued. “You can deny it all you want but that don’t mean it’s not true. “Everything coming into your life you are attracting into your life. You’re like a magnet.”

    “Well, this magnet’s going to attract some milk,” he’d said before going out the door.

    He had made fun of her ever since she first heard Oprah talking about The Secret but deep down she thought that maybe he believed her. Or would, if he would just give it a try. He would come home so angry about something that happened out there – the security guy asleep in the chair, or someone who wouldn’t give his seat up on the subway – and she would tell him, “Every bad thing that comes into your life, you make happen.”

    Sometimes that really made Floyd angry. “Is that right? Every bad thing? I made happen every bad thing that came into my life, Marcy?” He would tower over her, breathing heavily, staring at the top of her lacquered hair until she was silent.

    She looked closely at the big digits on the clock by the bed. It was almost 8:30 and she still had not done her makeup. From the drawer in the nightstand on her side of the bed she looked for her own pill organizer and then realized she had already taken it out. She put it under the light, right beside that picture of her two boys, smiling in the lap of a black Santa, and looked at Wednesday. There were still pills in the morning box but the evening box was empty. Maybe she took the evening pills by mistake. Not that it mattered ‘cause they were basically the same. Or maybe she hadn’t filled the PM part.

    Looking at the rainbow colored compartments (Wednesday was green, Thursday red) she thought of Wilson, who had the hardest time with his R’s when he was little – “Weeding Wainbow,” he would say about his favorite show, and his brother would laugh at him. She felt overcome for a moment and then heard her husband’s keys in the door.

    She took the morning pills, four altogether, as Floyd shouted at her from the kitchen.

    “Do you know how much they wanted for a half-gallon of milk?” She imagined his face as he said the price and the way he would look at her afterwards. He might be looking that way right now, even though she wasn’t there.

    “Cost of everything is going up,” she yelled back. Then she stood and headed for the bathroom. “I got to get a move on.”

    “Ain’t you even going to drink your milk?” She heard him swear as she closed the bathroom door.

    The bus driver turned out to be some white guy who’d been sleeping in the back while people waited outside. The whole bus was talking about it, even after they got out of the Holland Tunnel and were getting on the turnpike, people tisking and hmm-hmming until Floyd wanted to yell, “Who told you to stand out there in the first place? It’s not even cold.” But he kept quiet and sat by a window, alone thank you very much, though Tommy insisted on sitting right in front of him, while Marcy huddled on the other side with a bunch of ladies. They outnumbered the men five to one anyway; he let Tommy represent, going back and forth across the aisle like some congressman making a deal. Each time he went over to the ladies he would say something so low that Floyd couldn’t hear and they would all laugh and holler.

    “I think it’s about time for some music,” Tommy said after one of his sorties. He had a gym bag with him that also said Mets on it, and from it he pulled a boom box that he tried to balance on the seatback in front of him. He pushed play and Johnnie Taylor started in on “Who’s Making Love” and the ladies all laughed, even though the sound was kind of wobbly. From the front of the bus the driver said something, they could see him looking at them in the rear view mirror, but no one tried to hear him. In fact Tommy stood up, with the boom box on his shoulder, and started to shake it in the aisle, which made the driver get on the mike.

    “Sir, I’m going to have to ask you to sit down.” He had some kind of accent, Russian or something, but no one really paid him any mind.

    The hits kept coming; it must have been some kind of collection since Floyd never heard a deejay. Tommy jammed the boom box between the headrest and the window so it wouldn’t fall down and turned around to look at Floyd, but not before looking at the driver, who had his eyes on the road again.

    “How ‘bout a little taste?” Tommy said, taking a half-pint in a brown bag from the pocket of his jacket.

    “Too early for me,” Floyd said, looking out the window. To him it always looked like New Jersey was halfway through being torn down.

    Across the aisle Marcy was in the middle of a conversation with the other ladies but she didn’t feel quite right. It started as soon as she left the building; she had picked out a brooch to go with her blue blouse, a little gold tree with red apples on it, but she had left it sitting in front of the mirror. Now she felt naked, all that blue stretching out below her chin like an empty ocean almost and she felt like she was being pulled back from drowning each time one of them stopped talking. That meant somebody was supposed to say something, you were supposed to jump in like it was a game of double-Dutch.

    “What I value most is the privacy,” Marcy said, but no one answered. She had a feeling she had said that before. The topic was assisted living and how to know when you needed it.

    “Until you wake up privately dead,” said the lady in the Kente cloth. Marcy didn’t remember meeting her before, a friend of Helen’s was how she was introduced, but she didn’t like her now. She had these gray and white streaks in her hair, extensions by the look of it, but it reminded Marcy of mud. Besides she was probably the youngest woman of the bunch, what was she talking about dying for?

    “My boy checks in on us every night,” said Marcy and immediately wondered why she had. It wasn’t true. Most times she had to call Eric and he never sounded too happy to hear from her. He did come to visit though, once a month at least. They saw less of him after his divorce, though you’d think it would be the other way around.

    “Where are we?” she said suddenly, looking out the window. Everything looked the same.

    “You keep asking that,” the lady in the Kente cloth said, or maybe she said. Marcy wasn’t looking at her and the music Tommy was playing made her feel lost.

    “Sending this one out for all you ladies,” said Tommy, like he was some deejay, and they all laughed but Marcy didn’t think it was funny. It was that song about sitting on a park bench that always made her sad. “I see her face everywhere I go/on the street and even at the picture show/have you seen her?”

    There was a hospital up there high on a hill and for a second she felt that the bus was going to take off and fly straight up to its doors. She closed her eyes and felt herself rise.

    They parked in the lot of the Showboat casino. Though they could have gone anywhere they wanted, the thirty odd passengers that disembarked made for the Showboat as if summoned, shuffling and limping toward the entrance in a broken conga line.

    “No one says we got to go to this casino,” Floyd said to the crowd of ladies leading the way.

    “The Showboat has a Mardi Gras theme,” said the lady in the Kente cloth. She turned around to give Floyd the fisheye, pulling down her glasses as she did. “Besides, we got coupons for the Showboat.”

    He fell in line sullenly beside Tommy who offered him another drink. Floyd took a swallow this time without pulling down the brown paper to see what it was. It tasted like mouthwash.

    “Jesus, what the hell you drinking?”

    “Little peppermint schnapps.” Tommy tried to slap Floyd on the back but the big man danced away, handing the bottle back as he moved.

    “What she mean by a ‘Mardi Gras theme,’ anyway?” Floyd said.

    Tommy shrugged. “As long as they got free drinks and blackjack I don’t much care.”

    Seagulls screamed overhead. Floyd saw his reflection scowling in the window of a parked Humvee. He went to New Orleans during Mardi Gras when he was in the Navy, how many years ago? He got lost and someone stole his wallet. A man dressed as a woman tried to put beads around his neck, he remembered. You could have your Mardi Gras.

    Marcy was among the first of the women to enter the casino and the air conditioning hit her like a cold wave. “Good thing I remembered my shawl!” she said but no one answered. The music and the sound of the slot machines, dinging and ringing with sirens going off every five minutes as if some crime was being committed, swallowed her voice.

    Marcy had thought to bring rolls of quarters and silver dollars. While the other ladies were getting change she was already pouring her silver into a red plastic cup provided to her by a girl in the shortest skirt she had ever seen.

    “You must be freezing!” Marcy said but the girl didn’t seem to hear her. Maybe she just got tired of people trying to talk to her.

    The slots area had thousands of machines and at noon it was already half filled, mostly old timers like her and Floyd. He and Tommy had set off in the other direction like there was a sign saying ‘Men, That Way.’ The carpets were in a pattern of red and orange and gold that reminded her of a kaleidoscope and the ceiling was made up to look like stained glass, though she knew real stained glass when she saw it and this wasn’t it. She felt like if she didn’t sit down she might just fall into the colors. She sat down at a quarter machine and began feeding it. She didn’t know where the other ladies had gone and looking over her shoulder left her none the wiser.

    “Y’all gonna have to find me,” she said and as if summoned a different lady in a short skirt appeared.

    “How you doing today?” she said. She had a tray filled with drinks and a notepad tucked into her belt. “Can I get you something to drink?”

    “Well I suppose you can!” Marcy turned in her chair to show her appreciation. “My name’s Marcy by the way, I come here from Brooklyn with a bunch of folks from my church group.”

    “Now isn’t that nice? My name’s Kim Sue. What can I get you?”

    Marcy smiled and opened her mouth. But she could not think of the names of any drinks, not just the fancy ones but any drink. She felt a trickle of sweat run down her back underneath her blouse.

    “It’s funny,” she said, embarrassed. “My mind’s just a blank today.”

    “Sure, no problem!” Kim Sue smiled back at her like one of those Chinese dolls, her name right there on her badge. “We have beer and wine and soda and mixed drinks.” She kept smiling at Marcy and continued. “I could make you a nice white wine spritzer, if you like.”

    “Oh, that sounds nice,” said Marcy, and it did sound nice, like a sprinkler in the summer time, the kind the boys used to play in. Kim Sue left and Marcy returned to the machine. Cherries and plums rolled past, never stopping at the same time.

    Eric used to chase Wilson through the sprinklers in the park and sometimes when Marcy wasn’t looking he would hold his little brother down and try to pull off his shorts in front of all the other children. She would get so mad at him, always teasing like that, knowing it would make Wilson cry and come looking for her, but she had a job then, looking after a little white boy named Oskar whose parents lived in Park Slope and worked all the time. Oskar’a parents didn’t mind too much when she brought her boys with her when she took him to the park. “As long as you remember,” the father said, “that Oskar is your first priority.”

    Well of course he is, mister doctor man! Why would my own flesh and blood come before your little prince? Good gracious, the things that man would say. If the wife heard him she would weigh in and try to soften the blow. “What my husband means is that we don’t want you to get too distracted. Three children is a handful.”

    Now that was the kind of thing only a white person would say. Where she came from three children was just getting started, even if she was done after Wilson, something her own mother could never understand.

    “Oh, don’t worry, ma’am,” Marcy would say. “I won’t ever let Oskar out of my sight.”

    All these people thinking someone was going to steal their child then, like the whole country had gone crazy. Soon they’d be putting their pictures on milk cartons and billboards and on TV during the news – “Have you seen Brandon?” Usually white kids. If a black kid went missing generally people know who took him.

    “Here you go, ma’am.”

    Kim Sue was back with her drink. It was in a big plastic cup with a straw that went in curlicues, like a roller coaster, like this was for a child. She started fishing in her coin cup.

    “Drinks are complimentary, ma’am.”

    Like I didn’t know that. She pulled out a Susan B. Anthony and put it on her tray. “That’s for you,” she said.

    “Very nice of you, ma’am. And if you need anything else you just let me know.”

    She turned to leave and Marcy was afraid to see her go. “Kim Sue, it’s like your momma gave you two names.”

    “Kim is my family name. Family name comes first in Korean.”

    “Is that right?” said Marcy. “Well I think family should come first, don’t you?”

    “Yes, ma’am.”

    Marcy thought that was something else she should write in her book but realized that she hadn’t brought it with her, and then forgot what she had said. “But they probably don’t spell it like that in Korea, do they? The Sue, I mean.”

    “No, ma’am, we have a different alphabet.”

    “Now isn’t that something?”

    She was balancing a tray full of drinks while she talked to Marcy so she let her go, disappearing into the big Tiffany lamp around them. A band was playing Dixieland and Marcy strained her eyes to see them. The music seemed to be coming from everywhere at once, “When the Saints Come Marching In.”

    “Let me tell you another,” she said, sipping on her drink. The lady at the machine next to her looked at Marcy and then moved away, taking her quarters with her. She watched as the drink spun up the straw when she sucked. Here we go loop de loop.

    Sometimes Eric would help her push the stroller as they went around the park, and Wilson would run so far ahead she would shout after him. “Don’t go where I can’t see you!” she’d holler, and Oskar, too big to be pushed around in a stroller, would try and stand up and yell after her. “Go where I can’t see you!”

    Wilson would hide like that at home as well; hide so good she couldn’t find him sometimes. They were living in Prospect-Lefferts, more house than they needed but you could afford those big limestone buildings then even on a Con Ed salary and Wilson would go into different rooms and be so quiet that she would get hysterical, be practically beside herself by the time her husband got home. Then they would hear him laughing. “Got you!” he would say and emerge from the cupboard or from behind the sideboard and Floyd would get so mad. That one time he came out of her closet wearing her bra and Floyd just about went crazy; took off his belt and chased him.

    She put in a coin and pulled the lever: a watermelon; a bell; the number seven in gold.

    “What numbers are you playing today?”

    She turned her head but nobody was there. Who had spoken? Just turning her head made the colors around her move and when she looked at the floor she saw the pattern there was moving too. It was like a flying carpet, the Vale of Cashmere –

    The Vale of Cashmere! That was the name of that strange corner of the park where she took the boys now and then. They were getting older; other boys took the place of Oskar, and Eric got too big to want to be with them. But Wilson kept her company as she made the rounds, bought them ice cream and wiped their sticky hands. People used to call it The Swamp and there was a muddy pond okay and some hanging trees.

    “How come you don’t play with boys your own age?” one of the kids had asked him once.

    “I just like to help my momma,” he’d said.

    He was the one who found out the real name of The Swamp, checked an old book out of the library and showed her on the map. There was a poem that went with it and Wilson stood up by the pond and put one finger in the air as he read: “Who has not heard of the Vale of Cashmere/With its roses the brightest the earth ever gave?”

    Another babysitter saw them by the pond once and came over to warn them. “You shouldn’t be down in there,” she said, afraid to come too close with her stroller in front of her. “They say men get together down there.”

    And after that Marcy noticed them, lurking about, standing in the trees. Once when she came down with Wilson and a stroller two men ran out, going in different directions.

    She didn’t think about it again for years, until Wilson was grown and still living at home, and he came back one night that first time with his face all bloody, drunk or high on something and smiled at her, blood on his teeth.

    “Hey, Momma, I been to the Vale of Cashmere!”

    That’s when Floyd said no more.

    “What numbers are you playing today?”

    She turned and the colors whooshed like a scarf being wrapped around her head. She saw her this time, a little woman, no bigger than a dragonfly like the ones the boys chased in the park, Wilson would put them in a jar with holes punched in the top, while Eric tried to cover it up with his hand so they would smother.

    “I’m looking for three sevens,” Marcy said to the dragonfly woman. “Are there some other numbers to play?”

    “That is the question, isn’t it?” said the faerie. “Are there other numbers to play?”

    And then she flew away, just like a little hummingbird, and Marcy got up to follow her, passing into the pattern of colors and leaving her cup of coins behind.

    Floyd went through all his money the first hour. Not all his money but all the money he’d meant to spend, the money he put in his shirt pocket, seemed to fly off the table. Dealer beat him every time: if Floyd had 18, the dealer had 19; if Floyd sat on a 19, the dealer hit him with two bricks.

    “I guess this lady feels like she has to show us what a blackjack looks like,” said Tommy, when the dealer drew her third in ten minutes. She apologized to them both, even though they didn’t tip her, and Tommy’s luck was better than hers: He doubled down twice and made a hundred bucks in the blink of an eye. All Floyd could do, once he had spent the money he had earmarked for this outing, was sit there and simmer in his resentment while Tommy’s chip pile grew.

    That was when Helen, the lady in the purple pantsuit, came and asked if he knew where Marcy was.

    “I thought she was with you,” said Floyd. It came out like an accusation.

    “Well, we agreed to meet for lunch at three,” she said, “but then nobody could find Marcy. We figured maybe you two went off together.”

    And that’s how well you know us, Floyd thought. “Maybe she just went off to another casino by herself,” he said. Even though he was losing, and wasn’t even playing at the time, he didn’t want to have to leave his spot and go look for his wife. “There’s no law says we got to stay here.”

    “Blackjack,” said the dealer, flipping another ace.

    But after a minute he did get up to look, as he knew he would, leaving Tommy, who still had a hot hand and no doubt wondered what all the fuss was about.

    “Did you try the ladies room?” he asked Helen.

    “That was one of the first places we looked. They have sofas in there, you know.” She paused. “Do you think we should call security?”

    The suggestion made his blood pressure rise. “No, I don’t think we should call security. Christ sake, grown woman goes off for a few minutes and you want to call the cavalry?”

    “Does she have a cell phone?”

    “Our son gave her one but she couldn’t figure out how to use it.” This was literally half true: Eric had given them each one last Christmas, and neither of them could figure out how to use it. By the time Floyd got the hang of it he realized that the only person he would call was his wife, which was kind of stupid since he saw her all the time anyway.

    They looked all the places that they had already looked and the lady in the Kente cloth joined them, acting more concerned that Floyd felt. “We need a system,” she said, as they circled the room for the second time. The place was more crowded than ever and Floyd could hardly hear what she was saying. “How about I go stake out the buffet and you stay here?” she suggested to Helen.

    “How ‘bout I go stake out the buffet?” Helen said. “I haven’t had lunch yet.”

    Floyd said they could both go feed themselves and take their time doing it; Marcy would turn up. He stood like a sentinel beneath the bells and sirens of the Mardi Gras slots, scowling most of the time. He hated slot machines; there was no sport in it, as he often told his wife. Blackjack at least you were playing the odds. Slots to him was just dumb luck, like a rabbit betting it wouldn’t get run over when it ran across the road. Twice he thought he saw his wife, and each time he took pleasure in anticipating just how much grief he was going to give her. But each time he was wrong.

    By four o’clock they were back together, Tommy too, and they began to set out in search parties. They were a small group: most of the travelers didn’t want to leave their stations, since the bus was scheduled to leave at six and this whole business had already cut into their time as it was. The lady in the Kente cloth, who finally introduced herself as Niobe, took charge. She contacted the hotel security, who seemed to have some experience with old folks wandering off, and as the witching hour neared, and the day-trippers started heading back toward the bus, she went out and argued with the bus driver, who was pretty adamant about leaving on time.

    “You can’t just go off and leave an old lady alone,” she scolded him. The engine was already running, gently shaking the bus, while the AC gusted out the door in heavy welcoming breaths.

    “I won’t be leaving her alone,” the driver said. “I will be leaving you to find her.”

    He agreed to wait as they made one last search. A handful of them fanned out, going to neighboring casinos and restaurants, off the boardwalk and into the side streets. Floyd couldn’t help but think that Marcy was messing with him the whole time, and when he saw the impatient faces of the other folks on the bus – they’d lost their money and had their fill, they just wanted to go home – he couldn’t help but side with them.

    Most of the people he saw as he wandered were wearing shorts and T-shirts. Used to be people would get dressed up to go someplace. And when did everybody get so fat? Walking down the boardwalk, bag of French fries in your hand, what did you expect? The new motto for the city was “Always Turned On,” which he found kind of creepy. There was nothing that he saw that turned him on.

    Doors were open, air conditioning blasting out, cooling nothing. Floyd took to popping into places and doing a quick look around, not even asking half the time if they’d seen anyone who looked like his wife. One, they couldn’t hear you with all that noise and two, half of them couldn’t speak English.

    “You seen an old black lady?” he shouted at one girl scooping ice cream. Her nails were so long he figured they might end up in somebody’s cone. “Blue shirt, about this high?” She stared at him like he was the one with the language problem.

    He kept walking. Going in and out of the summer sun was making him dizzy, to say nothing of thirsty. He wished for the first time that Tommy was with him. That man would always stop for a drink. He saw people in those rolling chairs, being pushed by young people, girls sometimes. And you wonder why you so fat?

    Down at one end of the boardwalk he found what looked like a real bar. The crowd had trickled off as the sun sank lower in the sky. Go on, get out of here. A lot of good you been. Floyd ducked inside and felt the rivers of sweat roll out from under his hat and chill on his face and neck. His glasses steamed as he took a seat at the bar and ordered a gin and tonic. He perched on the stool and looked up at the game on TV. The waitress brought him his drink and man did that taste good. No skimping on the gin, either. He forgot to ask her about Marcy. His wallet was bothering him, he felt like he was balancing on it. When she asked him if he wanted to start a tab he simply nodded.

    “You got a phone?” She pointed to an old-fashioned booth in the back, kind Superman used to change in. The place was filling up, young couples waiting for dinner. Went back to the hotel to put your dress shorts on? Once inside the paneled wood booth he forgot who he was going to call. Eric, right. He searched the scraps of paper in his wallet for the number he never had cause to memorize and let it ring, go to voicemail, and then dialed again.


    “This ain’t no telemarketer.”

    “Hey, Pop.” He did not sound happy to hear from him and Floyd had already put enough change in the machine so he cut straight to the point.

    “We in Atlantic City and your mother’s gone missing.” He backtracked from there, explaining the whole afternoon in greater detail than Eric needed, but never did his son sound any more excited than Floyd felt. He asked the obvious questions – had they called the police? Who else was looking?

    “Did she have her cell phone?” he asked, pointedly.

    “That’s why I was calling,” Floyd said. “I figured maybe she’d called you.”

    Eric was silent, and Floyd knew that he knew he was lying. He imagined him at home, still in his work clothes, the sound on the TV muted, his eyes on the game. From his perch in the booth Floyd could see the TV over the bar. Jeter was trying to steal.

    “I’m sure she’ll turn up, Pop. I mean, where’s she gonna go?”

    “I know that.”

    “You got your cell phone with you? So I can call you if she does?”

    Floyd muttered something and got off the phone. That boy would go to his grave asking about those damn phones. He should just wrap them up and give them back to him for Christmas. Turn ‘em into salt-and-pepper shakers.

    When he got back to his seat at the bar Jeter got picked off and he ordered another drink. Now they could send the search party out for him. The tumblers were tall and when he turned in his seat he found he had company. Big old white dude with long hair and a pointed beard. He was sipping a Budweiser longneck and looking at the screen. His arms were covered in tattoos; dragons, snakes and skulls disappeared into his shirtsleeves.

    “Fuckin’ Yankees,” he said and turned to look at Floyd. “Nice hat.”

    Floyd turned to face his own reflection in the mirror behind the bar. “You wouldn’t believe how long I had this hat,” he said.

    “There isn’t much I wouldn’t believe,” the man said.

    They got to talking. Turned out he worked in a tattoo parlor on the boardwalk, which explained all the ink. Half way through his second drink and Floyd was feeling generous in his opinions.

    “Back in the day,” he said, “man had a tattoo it meant he’d been someplace. In the service, in the joint, you know.”

    “I hear you,” the man said. “These days it just means you been to the mall.” He drained his beer and held up the empty. “Buy you a drink?”

    “Let me buy you a drink,” said Floyd, and pulled out the fat wallet that had been giving him such a pain and laid it on the counter. Soon he had the pictures out and was showing him snaps of Eric, bragging on his job even if he wasn’t exactly sure what he did. Then one of the whole family, when everyone was young.

    “Where’s your other boy?” the stranger asked.

    Floyd made a face like he was sucking on a lime. “Wilson got killed in a hold-up ten years ago,” he said.

    “Oh, man, I am sorry. They catch the guy who did it?”

    “No, it was in Prospect Park one night. Lot of crime in there.”

    “That’s why I could never live in the city,” the man said, which struck Tommy as funny. Most people would be scared of him, even in Brooklyn.

    “So what happens when folks get old?” said Floyd, changing the subject. “Maybe they don’t want all those tattoos any more.”

    “Shit, you don’t have to wait ‘til your old to regret something stupid you did.” The man laughed and Floyd got a glimmer of a gold tooth in his head. “People come in all the time wanting to have tattoos taken off, usually the name of some girl that don’t love them anymore.”

    “Can you do it?”

    “Sure,” the man said. “Hurts like hell and costs twice as much. But we can do it. Easier just to change it, though.”

    “How do you mean?”

    “Well, there was this one girl who loved a guy named Chris and had it tattooed on her ass. Until she found Jesus and then we just added a ‘T’.”

    He didn’t smile at first and it took Floyd a minute to figure it was a joke. He smiled first. “Hey, I got one,” he said. The stranger’s eyes gleamed in anticipation. “There was this guy who loved this old girl so much he had her name tattooed on his Johnson.”

    “Now that’s gotta hurt!”

    “Hell, yeah.” Floyd wiped his mouth. “Then they broke up, you know, and soon he started missing her real bad. So he went all over looking for her, from Wisconsin all the way down to Jamaica. Then he’s in the bathroom one day and he looks over and he sees this other guy’s dick.” He stopped for a minute. The stranger kept staring at him. “Now I can’t remember that girl’s name.”

    “Is it important?”

    “Yeah, it’s the whole punch line.”

    “Uh, oh. Better have another drink.”

    He felt flushed and excused himself to go to the bathroom. There he stared straight ahead at the wall and read all the graffiti as if looking for a message. And by the time he got back to the bar he was not surprised to see the stranger was gone and with him his wallet though all Floyd could feel was a keen sense of disappointment: He remembered the end of the joke now. He had remembered that old girl’s name.


    voice from the planet

    ‘Vale of Cashmere’ was first published by Harvard Square Editions in Voice from the Planet, FREE from March 30 – April 3, 2017 at Amazon Kindle US, and Kindle UK among others. Sean Elder’s writing has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, National Geographic, New York Magazine, Salon, Slate, Vogue, Elle, Men’s Journal, Men’s Health, O: The Oprah Magazine, Gourmet, Food & Wine, Details and many other publications. The essay he contributed to the collection of men’s writings The Bastard On the Couch (Morrow, 2004) was reprinted on three continents; his essay on ecstasy, included in the collection of drug writings entitled White Rabbit (Chronicle Books, 1995) was called “seminal” by Granta; and a piece he wrote about being a stay-at-home dad for Oprah was included in her best of O collection, Live Your Best Life (Oxmoor, 2005). He has co-authored several books, including Websites That Work with designer Roger Black (Adobe Press, 1997) and Mission Al Jazeera with former Marine captain Josh Rushing (Palgrave, 2007). He also works as a book doctor and helped edit the forthcoming Making Rounds with Oscar by Dr. David Dosa (Hyperion, 2010). He lives in Brooklyn, New York with his wife and daughter.

    Share Button
  • All at Once: Excerpt of the Novel

  • I step onto a wide stone platform surrounded by water and lie on my stomach to peer down over the edge. At my approach, tiny fish scatter like drops of colored light; crabs pause, wary, then scuttle along the sides of the basin, stuffing their mouths as fast as they can with alternate pincers. After a while, a kind of brown finger wriggles out from the shadows. Another one emerges, then two more, and finally the bulbous body of an octopus comes into view. It skims along until the water is too shallow then starts to walk, using its tentacles as legs. When the water gets deeper it pushes off against the sandy bottom to glide, once more, just beneath the surface. It circles round and round my platform.

    aao cover

    My back begins to prickle, and I realize I’ll be burnt to a crisp if I don’t find shelter pretty soonthe ocean breeze masks the sun’s virulence.

    Standing up makes me momentarily dizzy. The tide has gone out, uncovering rocks studded with barnacles or slick with thick green hair. I head back toward the flat sand and continue walking, looking for a place to rest. I’ve just about resigned myself to the idea of a plastic chair, when I spot a barraca that’s not open for business. The beach in front of it is empty, the small structure shuttered; its thatched roof casts a nice, wide stripe of shade onto the sand. Gratefully, I set up camp, taking out the water and crackers I brought, spreading out my towel to sit on, and leaning against the barraca wall with the empty backpack in between for cushioning. A sigh of relief.

    The ocean is now more white than blue. At the horizon, a wavering smudge might be a cruise ship or an oil rig. The great mass of water is barely disturbed by shifting waves, fretful and sluggish like a dog settling down to sleep. There’s an occasional bloom of white spray when a wave breaks against rock; wisps of cloud trail across the sky. I yawn, lie down on the towel, and close my eyes.

    Now the landscape is reduced to the rustle of wind in the palm thatch, the faint piping of a distant bird, and the dull roar of the ocean. I stretch my arms and let them flop back down. Rolling my head slowly from side to side to loosen the tension in my neck, I notice that this movement causes the pitch of the ocean to vary ever so slightly. Intrigued, I try it a few more times, just to make sure.

    There’s a lesson in that, I reflect: reality changes according to your viewpoint. I roll my head once more from side to side then lie still again, listening to the tiny, ceaseless fluctuations within the monotone.

    An insect lands on my footwithout opening my eyes I flex my toe to chase it away, and realize that the gesture produced an infinitesimal shift in the ocean sound. Bizarre! I can understand the position of my head influencing what I hear, but the position of my toe? (more…)

    Share Button

Recent Articles:

The Vale of Grief

By Rajani Kanth


Evening mist at morn

Why is it dusk at dawn?


The  sun is burning low

The moon has shed its glow


Nature is weary of time

As I with this idle rhyme


An Era is passing on

Ere long will all be gone


None left to witness bear

To wake, wonder, or care

What price that grail of gold?

What now can be bought or sold?


The seas will restless churn

Far forests silent burn


The stars soon fade away

The end of the world is nigh –

Nothing surreal can stay


Save the heart in endless quest

Beyond  requital, or rest

Though wan and woebegone

Will  softly  sojourn on


© R.Kanth 2021


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

Goodbye 2020!

Goodbye, 2020. You brought us awareness, a record drop in carbon emissions: there really were some good things about you, as memorialized in this poem by Rajani Kanth.




The heart can speak

But it sings

a bird  can walk

But it wings


Lightness soareth


Even in this woestruck

World of  Care


The Modern World

Wreaks   Gravitas

More than

Spirit can bear


Let a  lilting  heart

wean it to sing

the   chirruping  bird

learn it to wing


As we men and women

Work and weep

Look, In the seas::

Dolphins love – and leap!


[© R.Kanth 2020]


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda,, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

The Failed Society

by Rajani Kanth

For decades, the ‘failed state’ canard has been invoked to bring down governments perceived as hostile to the West, and/or to swipe their resources.

Not that the West ever really needed the aid of arguments.

Cannon, and chicanery, sufficed – amply.

It’s a hoary game.

For 400 years, no justification has ever been needed.

They went, they saw, they pillaged.

That’s the real saga of the ‘rise of the west’, cannily buried in pedantic, and otiose, academic discussions of ‘capitalism’, ‘modernisation’, etc., ad nauseam.

Substitute the more robust term ‘empire’, and one grasps the real truth: surely, and swiftly.

EM (EuroModernism is the specific form of Modernism institutionalised in Europe, after their putative ‘enlightenment’). Capitalism was the accidental by-product of empire: not vice-versa, as is widely believed.

Today, China has shown that a society can ‘rise’ – to real heights – without any of the above means/mechanisms.

It’s a lesson wholly lost – wasted? – on the present Masters of the Universe.

No: they would prefer to let that fact go unnoticed.

And, for owning the world’s media, they can even ensure that, easily.


The US is a failed society, by real, anthropic standards.

What is a ‘failed’ society?

When the only connection between its constituents is raw self-interest.

Need I say more?


Given that the aforementioned trait is basic to All EM capitalist societies, they are all doomed to societal collapse: depending only on the strength of the resistance of pre-EM cultural bondings.

If one wonders why denizens of EM societies seem ‘reconciled’ to their denuded state of being, it is because they have no direct experience of any alternate modes of co-existence (not dissimilarly, the generation growing up in the US now has to be inured to War, as a permanent condition of existence).

So, the stultifying alienations of EM are seen, merely, as ‘life’.

Here the Non-European EM societies have a decisive advantage: they do have a flourishing pre-EM culture, so they can comprehend the hollowness of the EM societal frame quite readily.

It is this that explains why the curse of Asocial Individualism has never really taken strong root in any non-European, but still Modernist, society (India, Egypt, etc.), even when they adopt the rest of the EM litany.


As I have previously written,

the US is, also, the very first nation to move into the dystopia of an Amoral Society ( a contradiction, in terms).

Mind, I didn’t say ‘ immoral’.

For, to be immoral one has to know the difference between moral and immoral.

That distinction is no longer, widely or seriously, regarded, within/without the ruling orders in the US.

Whence the proud clamor of being, self-aware or not, in the Post-Truth stage of (d)evolution.


Let me sketch the nature of the transition, at issue.

First, EM societies, at large, consolidated the noxious framework of Modernism (invidiously, claiming it as an index of ‘progress’), 16th-18th centuries.

It was the First Strike against the foundational logos of a real, anthropic, society ( I have listed the various ‘traits’ of EM society, and its antithetical tribal social forms, several times before: so won’t repeat them here).

Then, in the late 20th century, they ‘slid’ into Post-Modernism, an enhanced, and augmented, stage of nihilism : where ‘anything goes’, so long as consistent with the demands of an endlessly acquisitive state of being.

That was the springboard to the Amoralism, of today, where antic societal norms have ceased to operate, and the only limit to any and all forms of misanthropy is the residual instruments of the ‘law’ alone.


What does this stage, which is the one prior to Unfettered Barbarism, the Last Stage and Terminus, signify?

It is where not merely the ruling elites, but vast sections of the populace, embrace sociopathic modes of behavior, as the norm.

It were almost as if the Hobbesian condition of bellum omnium contra omnes, which Hobbes had intended to describe a ‘state of nature’, has been achieved in a latter-day, modernist society: to the detriment of all.

As if in confirmation, social psychologists report that mutual empathy, amongst high-schoolers and the young, has lapsed by some 60% since 2000.

What is the provenance of such a historic devolution?

The source is in the active encouragement of Asocial Individualism (one of the important innovations of the so-called Enlightenment and the Reformation), which, analogous to the corrosive effects of money in a simple economy, dissolves societal ties – irreversibly.

Once those social (whence moral) bonds atrophy, we humans develop radical pathologies – such as rabid sociopathy – that are but stepping stones: to madness.

So, we live in not merely a ‘sick’ society, but in a growingly insane one.

Insanity is the anthropic consequence of being stripped of the healing benefice of the affective ties of community.

We are simply not designed to subsist as competing individuals.

And when that norm is enforced, we swiftly self-destruct into apathy, anomie, psychic disorder, and emotive decay.

Humans, stripped of the nurturing felicities of the affective life, suffer a disabling/disorienting corrosion of mind and spirit.

It is in that sense that, banal as it may sound to the modernist sensibility, love is the abiding leitmotif of the human condition.

Failing that, the Apocalypse.

Only such a genre of madness can insouciantly drop 40,000 bombs a year on innocents who have done the US no harm, years after year, without a second thought.

Watch the clip of US troops, provided by Assange (for which he is now being tortured by the Brits: in characteristic display of the double-standards, and hypocrisy, of the Brutish Isles), mow down civilians in Iraq, whilst laughing, to get a sense of the casual depravity.

That event can be multiplied n times over, in all of the genocidal playgrounds of the West: Libya, Afghanistan, et. al.

Such overweening, homicidal, ardor! – incurable, apparently, for centuries on end.

Remorse, anyone?

No, the Amoral Society has none, knows none.

So the West, i.e., the US and the EU, can calmly stand by and let the wretched millions of Yemen go to the wall, in famine, death, and disease, while faking high concern for the Uyghurs of China.

Touching, this empathy for human suffering.


The US is not the only failed society around.

The UK, it’s historically bonded twin, is another: though owing to its still functioning working class mores, and the residual survival of affective Celtic cultures, the rot is not as far advanced.

The US began its history, of predatory settler colonialism, devoid of any such grounding roots.

Another way to say this is that the UK is not, yet, an Amoral society.

The UK admitted its own ‘failed society’ state of becoming when it, recently, appointed a “Minister for Loneliness’.

Endemic loneliness, that is the classic EM condition: it’s the other, dark, cost, side of the revered ‘GDP’ ledger.

Ever met a Masai, or a Bushman (still living within their tribal culture) who was lonely?

Loneliness, like resource-deprivation, and despair, are uniquely Modernist creations.

Within that matrix, there is no cure for it.

As an aside, it is this very interminable angst, and existential despair, that creates the frequent surges of powerful art, music, and literature – although that high efflorescence, of spirit, cannot even begin to fill /soothe the void.


Why is any of the above, I mention, important now?

Because an Amoral Society can, and will, see to certain planetary extinction, if unchecked, being coolly indifferent to the fate of the Other(s).

This Other is other cultures, other peoples, other faiths; and, finally, the Planet itself, which is itself viewed as some ‘external’ backdrop to the regime of crass greed and inveterate cupidity.

In their carpe diem world, there is no tomorrow to worry about.

The current US admin has displayed the above traits candidly, and super-abundantly, minus the usual, politic, dissemblings of prior admins.

Let there be no doubt as to why the world, at large, today, faces breakdown of societal and ecological balances.

No, it’s not just the US: blaming the US is a frequent European ploy, to evade their own mighty culpability as willing, and dutiful, poodles of their TransAtlantic Master.

Certainly, there are differences of interests that arise, between the US and the EU (and Canada and Australia) but they band together, en generale, when it comes to the conjoint pillage of Non-European, and usually defenceless, societies.

Consider the US-NATO in Afghanistan, as a case in point.

The mightiest forces in the world, from the wealthiest of nations, callously occupying and terrorising a land of rag-poor tribals, for 19 years (and yet unable to ‘pacify’ them).

It is, to my mind, analogous to the frequency of police terror in the US, where so-called ‘law enforcers’ gang up in numbers, to murder a helpless, often handicapped, victim: with wholesale impunity.

What profiles in valor!



How can all this be turned around?

The only redress we have is to restructure our lives, and livelihoods, self-consciously, from below.

Change is only effected by living differently. By building affective ties and communities, outside of the Matrix (of monetary and financial networks). The gradual erosion of the larger, macro, ‘system’ will follow, then, in due course.

For the macroscopic ‘nation-state’ is another, emblematic, EM entity, forcibly foisted upon the world.

It is artificial, and imposed: held together by a combination of bribery, force, and propaganda.

As anthropic beings, we cannot, in any meaningful manner, ‘relate’ to such alien, counterfeit, constructs.

We can, it would appear, only express, and realise, our human nature, in small, face-to-face, gemeinschaft communities.

Notice that the salve is neither economic, nor political: but, societal, and cultural.

EM ideologues, of left and right, fail to grasp this, for being trapped in the vapid philosophy of materialism.

Even EM ‘socialism’ – albeit well-intentioned, if myopic – went no further than aiming at a bigger bowl of goulash.

Had it pursued affective, communitarian, goals, instead, its fall from grace, and favor, might have been less calamitous: or, may have not have occurred at all.


I have done 3 books, thus far, that provide foundational theory for the thesis (and many related theses) above.

Chronologically, Breaking With the Enlightenment (1997); Against Eurocentrism (2005), and Farewell to Modernism (2017).

One could do worse than have a peruse?

I wouldn’t wait for the movie.

N.B. My critique of Modernist Society (deriving from European roots) is a transcendent one, bypassing the internal and immanent criticisms, such as have been handed down now for generations, from all sides of the Modernist spectrum of opinion. In that sense, it stands apart, and alone, from all extant critiques.

[© R.Kanth 2020]   


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda,, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

On Imminent Human Extinction

Covid has drawn a veil over another lurking terror: Abrupt Climate Change. We need to remain wary, and cognisant.

Dr Guy McPherson: Interviewed by Rajani Kanth on October 13, 2018, an exchange that’s even more resonant today


Guy R. McPherson is an American scientist, professor emeritus[2] of natural resources and ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Arizona.[3][4] He is known for the idea of Near-Term Human Extinction (NTHE), a term he coined[ about the likelihood of human extinction by 2026.


Professor Rajani Kanth is an economist, philosopher, and social thinker. He has served at major universities around the world, and has also served as an Advisor to the United Nations, in New York. He is the author/editor of several academic works in political economy and culture-critique; is a novelist and poet, and the author of several screenplays. . At Harvard University, he has held appointments in the Depts. of English, Economics, History, and Anthropology.



Rajani Kanth: Please explain the environmental threat to human existence you perceive that has brought you much notoriety in recent times.

Guy R. McPherson: First, a little perspective.

As with all other species in planetary history, except the few remaining, our species will go extinct. We are in the midst of the Sixth Mass Extinction. As with the five prior such events, most species on Earth will be driven to extinction in a relatively short period of time.

The post-Permian mass extinction caused the extinction of more than 90% of the species on Earth about 252 million years ago. It was the worst of the prior mass extinction events. As with all five of the prior mass extinction events, Earth’s recovery required several million years to become vibrant, verdant, and characterized by an abundance of multicellular organisms.

The current event is underlain by atmospheric carbon emissions about 10 times faster than those during the post-Permian event. It is no surprise that the ongoing Sixth Mass Extinction is proceeding an order of magnitude faster the post-Permian mass extinction.

According to an August 2010 report from the United Nations, an estimated 150-200 species are driven to extinction every day. The actual figure exceeds 200 species daily during the last few years.

In my case, the notoriety comes from my prediction that Homo sapiens will go extinct by 2026. Thus will we join the six other species within the genus Homothat have already gone extinct.

Specifically, I predict that there will be no humans on Earth by 2026, based on projections of near-term planetary temperature rise and the demise of myriad species that support our own existence.

Rajani Kanth: How does that differ from more mainstream views of climate change extant today?

Guy R. McPherson:My view differs from the conventional, conservative view only with respect to timing.

Every conservation biologist knows our species will join others in extinction not long after we lose the habitat that supports our species. Yet, doubtless due to a combination of personal and professional reasons, few other scientists are willing to connect the dots leading to our imminent demise. Among the personal reasons are parenthood. Amongst the professional reasons are the loss of support for one’s privileged position.

Rajani Kanth: How, and when, and why, did you come to believe in this thesis?

Guy R. McPherson: My lifelong pursuit of evidence, combined with my knowledge of conservation biology, lead me to believe we face extinction in the near future.

Conservation biology rests on the pillars of speciation (when and with what predecessors a species comes into existence), extinction (when the last member of a species dies), and habitat (the many factors necessary to support the populations of a species, including clean air, potable water, healthy food, and the means to maintain body temperature within a narrow range).

As with other species, human animals depend upon habitat for our survival.

More than 15 years ago, I reached the conclusion that the last member of Homo sapiens would die by 2030. I was co-editing a book about climate change at the time, and the evidence overwhelmed me.

The conclusion was so disconcerting, I did not write or talk about the subject for a few years. Less than two years after reaching the conclusion about near-term human extinction, I discovered the “hail Mary” pass that I believed would ward off extinction for a few more generations: global peak oil, or net energy decline.

Alas, passing the global peak for conventional oil in 2005 or 2006 did not cause the collapse necessary to turn off the heat engine of civilization. And our contemporary knowledge of global dimming, reported in the journal literature only since December 2011, indicates that collapse will actually accelerate human extinction relative to maintaining the omnicidal heat engine of civilization.

More than a decade ago, I began speaking publicly about human extinction. For a few years, I adhered to the conventional notion that our species will go extinct in about 100 years. As evidence accumulated, I shifted the timeline back to 2050, 2035, 2030, and ultimately 2025 for human extinction.

Our species will lose global habitat before 2025, thus marking the point of functional extinction. A few members of our species will persist beyond this loss of habitat for a few years, and the final members of Homo sapienswill die lonely, hungry, thirsty, and confused.

Rajani Kanth: What scientific evidence, either from your own research or from others, have you drawn this conclusion from (in layman’s terms if possible)?

Guy R. McPherson: I routinely describe two paradoxes, and the fact that we are in the midst of the Sixth Mass Extinction.

First, the paradoxes.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded in their vaunted fifth assessment that nearly all scenarios between now and 2100 require large-scale sequestration and storage of atmospheric carbon dioxide. This “geoengineering” must be accomplished at a tremendous scale if we are to survive. There is no known technology by which such an effort can be conducted, as pointed out by the National Academy of Sciences of the United States and a European body of similar stature. In short, fantasy technology is required.

The second paradox combines our knowledge of greenhouse gases and the aerosol masking effect (aka global dimming). As indicated by the Laws of Thermodynamics, civilization is a heat engine, even if civilization is underlain by “renewable” technology.

Yet, turning off the heat engine of civilization heats the planet even faster as a result of the aerosol masking effect. Industrial activity pours particulates into the atmosphere, and these particulates – notably sulfates produced by burning coal – act as an “umbrella” to keep incoming sunlight from striking the surface of the planet. These particulates are constantly falling out of the atmosphere, and industrial activity is constantly adding them.

While the greenhouse gases produced by industrialization are acting as “blankets” to hold in the heat, the particulates produced by industrialization are acting as “umbrellas” to keep the heat from striking Earth.

Damned if we do, and damned if we don’t, civilization is simultaneously destroying most life on Earth while also serving as a shield to protect most life on Earth. The abrupt rise in temperature resulting from the near-term demise of industrial civilization will proceed too rapidly for most species to “keep up” with the rate of change.

The plants that feed us cannot move. We cannot move them fast enough, and they depend upon unique environmental conditions (e.g., temperature and precipitation regime, extant soil, co-dependent species).

As if two paradoxes are not enough, we are in the midst of the Sixth Mass Extinction on Earth. Destroying habitat for the species that keep us alive will cause our extinction, too. The ongoing loss of habitat for human animals will accelerate, thus leading to our near-term demise.

I have provided supporting details within a long essay at Nature Bats Last (https://guymcpherson.com/climate-chaos/climate-change-summary-and-update/). This long essay barely mentions the likelihood and consequences of an ice-free Arctic Ocean.

As Finland’s President Niinistö has been pointing out for more than a year, an ice-free Arctic will lead quickly to loss of habitat for humans on Earth (e.g.,http://finlandtoday.fi/president-niinisto-in-north-russia-if-we-lose-the-arctic-we-lose-the-world/). The near-term blue-ocean event was projected to occur in 2016 + 3 years by a paper in the 2012 edition of Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences(https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/suppl/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105345).

Rajani Kanth: If so, how is it that most of your fellow-scientists have missed what is so apparent to you?

Guy R. McPherson: Most scientists lack themultidisciplinary knowledge inherent in the enterprise known as conservation biology. Focused on the narrow domain for which they receive rewards, most scientists are missing the proverbial forest for the trees.

In addition, few climate scientists have a significant knowledge of biology or ecology. They seem to believe we can survive any environmental conditions due to our cleverness, and they fail to recognize the importance of habitat for our species.

Rajani Kanth: Does politics, or some other societal mechanisms, play any part in the apparent ‘denial’ by many of your colleagues of your ‘abrupt’ climate change thesis?

Guy R. McPherson: I suspect few scientists are willing to give up on three items: hope, privilege, and the myth of human supremacy. Hope, like fear, is projecting an outcome about the future. Like fear, hope fails to promote action.

These dual, four-letter words paralyze action by most people. And now that we are in the midst of abrupt, irreversible climate change, it is too late for actions to avoid or delay human extinction.

The privileges enjoyed by “first-world,” Caucasian males are legion.

I have plenty of experience in this privileged domain. It is the rare individual who will risk giving up support for his privileged position as a well-paid scientist within contemporary society.

Finally, most humans are plagued by the notion that humans are superior to other organisms. Our big brains have allowed us to terraform the planet, extend our lives, and enjoy enormous comfort. Ultimately, however, we depend upon a verdant planet teeming with life. In sawing off the limb on which we rest, we are driving our own species to extinction (to paraphrase conservation biology Paul Ehrlich).

Rajani Kanth: You have paid a personal (professional) price for your convictions: please elaborate.

Guy R. McPherson: As with a few other scientists, I was censored overtly during my tenure at the University of Arizona. As with nearly all scientists, I censored myself, too.

Ultimately, I chose to the leave active service at the university more than 9 years ago for a variety of reasons. This left me with little access to audience and money. The move away from campus made me freer in speaking my mind, and I remain the subject of abundant character defamation, libel, and slander.


Is it conceivable that a ‘change is heart’ is possible, amongst the mainstream, sometime soon: if so what might provoke it?

Such a change is certainly possible.

If it occurs, which I doubt, it will be motivated by an enormous loss of privilege. Once it becomes difficult to secure water or food, the masses will notice the consequences of abrupt, irreversible climate change.

Alas, noticing the consequences of abrupt, irreversible climate change renders abrupt, irreversible climate change neither gradual nor reversible.

Rajani Kanth: How do you cope with this ‘rejection’ given that you have built a ‘committed’ life around your ideas.

Guy R. McPherson: Inspired by Camus, I view life through the lens of absurdity. My ideas are motivated strongly by evidence, thus making me a rationalist.

I understand why others are not motivated by evidence, and this understanding does not push me away from rationalism.

Rajani Kanth: Are there any important scholars who support your ideas?

Guy R. McPherson: My ideas are rooted in the incredibly conservative refereed journal literature.

No rational scholar takes issue with the evidence I present. Indeed, the evidence is produced by the very scholars who defame, libel, and slander me. As a result, these scholars are left with the discomfort of (a) accepting the evidence they discover but (b) discrediting the scholar who collates, integrates, and synthesizes the evidence.

To more directly answer your question, Dr. Peter Wadhams and Paul Ehrlich are on record as supporters of my work and my conclusions. The collection of scientists using the pseudonym Sam Carana also seem supportive.

Rajani Kanth: Has it been a costly affair getting your message out in the face of the obduracy of the Establishment?

Guy R. McPherson: If you are aiming for the understatement of the millennium, consider the mission accomplished.

I have sacrificed my paid position as a tenured full professor at a major university, the attendant privilege, the associated easy money, and virtually every relationship in my life in the pursuit of rational scholarship.

Rajani Kanth: Your thesis was formulated some time ago: given new data that must arise daily, is there any reason for you to change your mind?

Guy R. McPherson: As indicated earlier, I have often changed my mind.

The changes have been in the direction expected with accumulating evidence: I have shortened my predictions regarding the demise of Homo sapiens.

Rajani Kanth: How do you see the Big Threat that you talk about playing out in reality (if it comes about)? What are its associated dangers for law and order, and societal peace? Can they be ‘contained’ in any way?

Guy R. McPherson: The so-called “power elite” knows what I know.

As a result, I strongly suspect we are heading for overt and massive military action. Maintaining global hegemony is the goal. Any and every means will be employed. These means will fail, and will be associated with or followed by societal collapse. There is no way to forever sustain an unsustainable set of living arrangements, and nature bats last.

Rajani Kanth: Your notion of environmental crisis is unusual in that it appears to designate an incurable, terminal condition. Are there any conceivable offsets?

Guy R. McPherson: Civilizations come and, so far, nearly all have gone.

The abrupt rise in temperature resulting from loss of the aerosol masking effect assures industrial civilization a special place in history.

Species come and go.

We are not nearly as wise as we believe we are. I suspect at least a few members of each of the now-extinct six species in the genusHomo thought they were very special, too.

Rajani Kanth: If you are right then what happens to the broader forces of Evolution? Does everything die, including the Planet?

Guy R. McPherson: If the Sixth Mass Extinction follows the pattern of the prior five, then Earth will become a vibrant, verdant planet characterized by abundant multicellular life within 10 million years or so. This is the optimistic view rooted in planetary history.

A more realistic assessment includes the rate of change of this extinction event relative to its predecessors, as well as the inconvenient collapse of the world’s nuclear power facilities.

Consistent with Fermi’s Paradox, I suspect the uncontrolled, catastrophic meltdown of more than 450 nuclear power plants will cause the loss of all life on Earth.

Rajani Kanth: Not right away, of course. And perhaps not at all.

Guy R. McPherson: But I fail to understand how bathing in ionizing radiation, hence multi-generational lethal mutations, will benefit life on Earth. And that same ionizing radiation may well strip away Earth’s atmosphere, causing our planetary home to join Mars as a lifeless rock floating through an indifferent universe.

Rajani Kanth: How did we get here, in your opinion? To what extent does the modern ‘way of life’ explain it?

Guy R. McPherson: We arrived at this undesirable historical point through a unique series of missteps.

Was it opposable thumbs that led to our demise? Was it climbing out of the trees? Was it harnessing fire? Was it the stable, cool temperature as Earth emerged from the last ice age that gave us the unique ability to grow, store, and distribute grains at scale (i.e., the rise of civilizations)? Was it the industrial revolution? Was it harnessing the atom? Was it all of the above?

I do not know.

I doubt we will ever know with great certainty. Yet here we are, at the most privileged time in human history that, coincidently (or perhaps not) also marks the end of human history. Extinction is soon to follow.

Rajani Kanth: You are aware of the North-South divide in global affairs: do you believe that ‘blame’ is to be equally shared?

Guy R. McPherson: There is no doubt that the global North burns more fossil fuels than the global South. Does this mean everybody in the global North is equally to blame?

There is no doubt the United States has led the way to our imminent demise. Does this mean everybody in the United States is equally to blame?

We are quick to blame.

I do not believe it accomplishes much. There will be no time for justice with respect to abrupt, irreversible climate change in the short time we have left.

Placing this idea within society, are the Corporates and the hoi polloi also equally at fault?

Again, there is no doubt that a few people are more “guilty” than others with respect to abrupt, irreversible climate change. They knew the likely outcome of our collective actions long before most of us.

We are quick to impose guilt.

I do not believe it accomplishes much. There will be no time for justice with respect to abrupt, irreversible climate change in the short time we have left.

Rajani Kanth: Was there any point, after your initial discovery of the issues, when we could have reversed this race to calamity?

Guy R. McPherson: I suspect abrupt, irreversible climate change leading to near-term human extinction was guaranteed by the exponential burning of fossil fuels characteristic of the last three decades.

Or perhaps it was guaranteed when humans harnessed the atom. Or perhaps when the industrial revolution began. Or perhaps when the first civilizations began.

These all seemed like good ideas at the time.

Rajani Kanth: Do you feel you have done your best to get the word out?

Guy R. McPherson: Absolutely.

I have worked diligently for decades, despite obstacles that would have stopped every other person I know. I have given up money, time, and relationships.

I suspect you would be hard pressed to find any individual who has done more than me in the battle for the full truth, rooted in evidence. The cost, for me: everything that matters, except my integrity.

If it all goes the way you see it, is there any scope left to believe in any concept of ‘intelligent design’ to Creation?

There is no evidence to support the notion of intelligent design.

If there is a creator, it must be very disappointed in its creation.

Rajani Kanth: What are your own personal views on god, religion, etc.?

Guy R. McPherson: I am a scientist.

I am a rationalist.

When I am working, I am agnostic. In my personal life, due to my path rooted in philosophy, I vary daily from an indifferent agnostic to a militant anti-theist.

There is a less than 5% chance of any idea being wrong, en generale: do you think you could be wrong?

I suspect the evidence I rely upon for my work is very conservative because of the way it is produced.

If it is incorrect, it likely is incorrect in a direction that doesn’t benefit our continued existence.

Rajani Kanth: What would it take to ‘prove’ you wrong, short of the world not ending?

Guy R. McPherson: Reversal of the two paradoxes and the Sixth Mass Extinction.

Rajani Kanth: How do the curious get access to your ideas? Is there a website? Any specific books, articles? Other sources?

Guy R. McPherson: My work is freely available atguymcpherson.com.

It comes from many sources, notably the refereed journal literature. As professor emeritus at a major university, I have access to an amazing library bursting with online publications. I can, and do, read primary literature to which relatively few individuals have ready access.

Rajani Kanth: You once said you were not going to have children owing to the certainty of what lies ahead? Was that a traumatic decision to make?

Guy R. McPherson: Not particularly.

I was a rational radical by my late teens. After coming across “The Limits to Growth” in my late teens, along with completion of a college biology course,

I could easily ascertain the likely consequences of continued exponential human population growth.

The suffering had already begun.

I could see no point in accelerating it.

Rajani Kanth: What do you recommend ordinary people do to ‘prepare’ for the End, if you are right?

Guy R. McPherson: I don’t know any ordinary people. I only know extraordinary people.

Accept the full truth about your imminent demise. Nobody gets out alive, an idea that applies to individuals as well as species.

Remain calm: Nothing is under control. The exceptions are the people in your life. Tell the full truth. Treat people, including yourself, with dignity and respect.

Pursue excellence. Although such pursuits will generate few external rewards, you will be able to look yourself in the mirror without embarrassment.

Pursue love. Why would you not?

Rajani Kanth: What would you recommend to Policy Makers on the same issue (to mitigate the harm to the public).

Guy R. McPherson: Tell the full truth.

Treat people with dignity and respect.

Expect the best from people.

Reward them when they deliver.

Rajani Kanth: Your final message to Humanity?

Guy R. McPherson: I am asked nearly every day for advice about living.

I recommend living fully. I recommend living with intention. I recommend living urgently, with death in mind. I recommend the pursuit of excellence. I recommend the pursuit of love. It’s small wonder I am often derided, mocked, rejected, and isolated by my contemporaries in the scientific community.

In light of the short time remaining in your life, and my own, I recommend all of the above, louder than before. More fully than you can imagine. To the limits of this restrictive culture, and beyond.

For you. For me. For us. For here. For now.

Live large. Be you, and bolder than you’ve ever been. Live as if you’re dying. Because you are.

No guilt.

We were all born into captivity. No blame. No shame.

[© R.Kanth 2020]   


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda,, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

The Don

by Rajani Kanth

After he leaves office, if he ever leaves office, people will wonder.

What made him The Don?

The Answer seems to have escaped the comprehension of the highbrow culture-vultures who dominate the airwaves, and soundbites, prompted by either bigotry or total devotion.

And it’s an important answer: just as he himself is an important political phenomenon.

No, it’s not his wealth.

Mayor Bloomberg, was a billionaire, too.

No, it’s not his tv celeb status, as a keen showman, either: Steve Colbert couldn’t rake in 70+ million votes.

Nor is it his xenophobic stances.

Rush Limbaugh couldn’t swing it.


So, what is it?

It’s a quality that rock stars used to possess in the Sixties, before rock, as a protest genre, was carefully subverted and routinised by the industry.

That they were truth-tellers.

It is this sense, that people had: that he told it like it is.

That he was speaking the unrehearsed Truth (to be sure, as he saw it), and that, too, stunningly, from Power.

It was a huge refresher: a change from the carefully scripted phony, hypocritical, mealy-mouthed politicos that have been the run of Washington Elites forever.

That was what mesmerized the jaded millions that voted for him.

Hitherto, they had turned a blind eye, and a deaf ear, to the gaggle of snake charmers who dominated political office.

Snake oil just didn’t cut it, with them.

But, here, clearly, was a breath of fresh air.

And it didn’t matter what he said, so gratifying was the assumption that what you saw was what you got.

Unlike the droves of career ‘politicians’ , a term of insult second , in power, only to ‘lawyers’ in the American lexicon.


Was/is he a truth-teller?

The Washington Post has tracked thousands upon thousands of his alleged lies.

But what about the scams of the Post (and its sister Media) itself, that misled us into so many gratuitous wars : who ,there, to track those for us all?

At any rate, with the Don, you got a mixed bag, in this respect.

He told the truth about many issues, and also covered up just as many others.

Yet, the latter were all of a see-through nature, like a little boy telling tales , with his hands in the cookie jar.

So, his indulgent fans readily , perhaps too readily, forgave him those excesses: being just as culpable, they knew, as he.


Is there a lesson, perhaps, in his example?

It’s an Empire of Lies we live in.

And people, despite the harsh existential threats they face today – unemployment, eviction, homelessness, poverty, insecurity, Covid, police violence – perk up to the one, who they believe, is not spinning yarns.

In a Post-Truth universe of Wholesale, Outright, Overweening, Corruption, they felt that he, au contraire, solo, was speaking the truth – to them.

Yes, I think there is a lesson.

In fact, a rather simple one.

But I doubt anyone in D.C. is keen on learning from it.

Spin, you see, is mother’s milk – in Uncle Scam country.


What do I make of the Don, personally?

Well, I regret, I am quite biased: I distrust Anyone who would be King (or Queen).

[© R.Kanth 2020]   


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda,, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

Stu Krieger at University of California

UCR library reading from THAT ONE CIGARETTE with follow-up Q & A on writing and publishing Thursday Oct 8, from 4:30-5:30 PST

Share Button

THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: Fighting for Women’s Rights in Weimar

This article first appeared in Ms. Magazine

The following is an excerpt from THE ROAD NOT TAKEN—the debut novel, out September 4, by feminist playwright, documentarian and writer Susan Rubin. In the book, one woman traverses through space and time on an epic journey of self-discovery—and in an effort to change world history.

The café was crowded and the jazz musicians on stage were loud. The interior was so filled with smoke that my friends and I chose an outdoor table. I was smoking a long, thin, pastel colored cigarillo in an ornate holder. My fingernails were black and as I looked at my reflection in the window of the café, I saw that my eyes were all blacked, too. I looked around at my companions dressed in flamboyant reds and yellows. They too had on defiant smoky eye makeup, with bright red lipstick and lots of beaded necklaces over their glamorous dresses.

My companions were pleasantly tanked up, and so was I. We had been drinking everything in the café, from beer we had moved to mixed drinks. We ate no food and smoked one pastel cigarillo after another as we talked in loud voices with extreme enthusiasm for our subjects. (more…)

Share Button

Empire Tales

by Rajani Kanth

Pax Brittanica to Pax Americana?

Or, put another way, out of the frying pan, into the…

Well, that’s, regrettably, the sorry Tale of our Times:

The Rise and (approaching) Fall of the Anglo-Norman Empire(s)…


My vantage point, in these jottings, should remain unmistakable.

I write, explicitly, as an ex-colonial.

Now, that last term deserves explication.

Not all of us (in the colonial world) are ex-colonials, despite the fact of formal decolonization.

Ideologically, most . in the colonial world, still remain colonials (Left, or Right, persuasions are equally culpable in this).

I have made it my ‘mission’ to reveal the depth and extent of that brainwashing.

It’s a cheerless undertaking: but, someone has to do it.

Everything I say here is all embedded in my larger critique of Eurocentrism (EuroModernism).

We live in a world under the thumb, if less and less by the day, of one of the most formidable of global empires: the Anglo-Norman empire.

Calling it by any other name does us all an injustice.

Sure, the EU is a part of it, but strictly as a junior partner.


Progressives, in the West, are still mainly Europhiles (including the US, in that categorisation): even those that think they are not.

All I do, in my writings, is – if inadvertently – hold up a mirror to them.

And they may not like what they see.

I don’t blame them, in the slightest.

I couldn’t stand to see what they see, either.

But, it is also really a matter of a supernal ignorance.

There are many semi-literates, even in high places, who still think Europe pulled off its ‘industrial and scientific’ revolution solo, on its own.

They have no idea of the truth.

I have run Doctoral seminars in this area, for years, and could still give them , or anyone else, an education.

There is also, by now, a burgeoning literature in this domain, though , sadly, it does not percolate into lay perceptions.

But it is real.

So, the chauvinism of our Europhiles is merely that: chauvinism.

There is no ontic basis for it.

Their ‘ comparative advantage’ lay ever, and to this day, in but three domains: war, looting, and chicanery.

To state it simply: European Ruling Elites (inclusive of the US) are, on any scale, the most accomplished ecocidal, and genocidal, mass-murderers, in human history.

Which is why their continuing, monotonic , claptrap of ‘human rights’ is so obnoxious, aside from deceiving no one, in these torrid times.

Their putative ‘enlightenment’ was also, to a great extent, a case of feathers ‘borrowed’ (without acknowledgment) from the many cultures they made contact with, and conquered.


The operative logos for the original Brit Empire was simple: Divide, and Rule.

For the Ams (the US) who took over the baton, after WW2, it was (sub)Divide and (mis]Rule.


Some difference!

For a while, there was another ‘difference’ which, by now , is quite levelled.

The Brits appeared more than ok with being hated: the Ams, leastways for a bit, wished to be loved.

Today, the latter appear ok with just being feared.

Of course, in all this, I am referring to the ruling elites, not the mass populace, which, everywhere, is cannon fodder and/or chattel labor for the rulers.


.But why should the twain be different at all?

They are cousins (one must give credit where it’s due, and bring in their eminent second cousins: Australia and Canada) in the flesh, and spirit.

The vaunted American ‘war of Independence’, par exemple, is a bit of a mild exaggeration.

It was not a great deal more than another case of ‘mutiny on the bounty’.

The Brutish Isles was no more an oppressor than the Colonies were.

In fact, given that the Brits did not practice slavery in England, it’s the US (i.e., the then ‘Colonies’ that was far more brutish.

Actually, it was Britain’s curbs on slavery (and westward expansion)that had the Colonies rise up, amongst some related issues.

So our daring mutineers were anything but liberators!

Indeed, more likely, the opposite.

One needs to graduate beyond grade-school propaganda to understand such matters.

But few of us do (no money in that, of course: I get it).

History is simply what historians say it is.

And winners of wars will – as everywhere – write their own (pseudo) histories.

Which the obliging gulls (media, intelligentsia, academe) , of left and right, lap up, eagerly.

But then again, that’s their job: they are only earning their paychecks.

To graduate from being gulls to being shills.


So, what unites the two lineages is not merely shared culture and history (although, as Bernard Shaw wrote, a century ago, they remain divided by a common language).

But Empire, Racism, and Capitalism (the order is important).

In fact, I consider Anglo-Normans to be masters, nay world leaders, in the science of exploitation.

No one else even comes close.

The US is still the lead case-study for that idea, I think, for anyone who wishes to investigate.

They took the antic Brit formula : and nearly perfected it.

Even chauvinism, in other words is expected to yield a profit: else , is deemed of no utility.

Hubris , if it must be, needs to pay tangible dividends: simple psychic satisfaction(s) will not suffice.

Britain made war for commerce.

The US makes not just war, but also peace, for commerce (this is the sordid rationale behind Trump’s abrogation of all extant treaties: there’s money to be made in re-negotiating ‘deals’).

The class structure, racial stratification, and gender divides, are all systematized ( this is a long-drawn, on-going, process ) for continuing surplus drainage.

No one, amongst the ruled, can escape the bite.

The world’s largest penal colony, the (industrial) world’s lowest real wage, the most under-funded public health industry, the most trigger-happy police, the most bloodthirsty military, the most extortionist financial sector, the highest concentrations of wealth, are far from being arbitrary, random, creations.

They are (all) integrally linked.


It is not merely the canny strategy itself, but the cool rationality with which it is implemented that is significant.

Take a glance at the grisly video where a cop calmly snuffs out the life of an Afro Am, on camera.

The cop is not spewing hatred, nor spitting rage.

He is, quite insouciantly, carrying out the demands of the system: keeping the subject population terrorized.

That was Britain, too.

The British general (Dyer) who , with typical Brit gallantry , massacred unarmed Indians – men, women and children – at Jallianwala Bagh (look it up) was also, on report, equally calm: only somewhat bemused at being tried for a crime that his nation had excelled in for centuries, across the globe.


That same icy insouciance extended to the business- as-usual, raw economic pillage as well.

Britain drained the economic life out of India: no army of leeches, or locusts, could have performed better.

So they could repave/renovate their filthy London Streets, with their ill-gotten loot, whilst the streets of Old Delhi decayed, with fading grace, into gutters.

No, England was never that quaint ‘nation of shopkeepers ‘ (Napoleon? Adam Smith?) , of literary allusion.

It was /is in the Modern era, a nation of prospectors, gamblers, hucksters, and fortune hunters .

And the US?

About the same, one would think.

But , more casually speaking, it could be styled, perhaps, a nation of used-car salespeople, with their ‘let’s make a deal’ approaches to everything.

To that extent , Trump is the one Prez who, above all others, represents their geist faithfully(though often-times he appears as a burlesque parody of it).

But it is also, make no mistake, a warlike, predatorial , aggressor state (like a few others).


Now, In terms of sheer soul-lessness it , surely, stands alone.

It is a breathtakingly sordid society because it is not an anthropic society at all, but a giant scatter of random individuals linked , via individualist self-interestedness, to various sites of production , consumption, and exchange.

Oscar Wilde captured it best when he quipped , aeons ago, that the US had leapt straight , from barbarism to decadence, bypassing the stage of civilization.

To which I must add that, today, in regression, it has reverted straight back to barbarism.

Fredrick Douglass knew all this in 1852, when he said , on the Fourth of July no less, that the savagery of the US, in his time, was unmatched by that of any other nation.

He should know, being an ex-slave.

MLK Jr , repeated that, a century later, when he called the US the greatest purveyor of violence in the world.

It still holds that (uncoveted) honor , today.


At any rate, now you can gleam how the putative ‘third world’ was/is manufactured, and made to order.

There is a causal, colonial , link between the prosperity of the West and the penury of its unfortunate colonies.

A historical contrast will help seal the point, dispositively.

Japan escaped direct occupation by European conquistadores; and so made its way to Modernism as a powerful entity.

But, India, the fabled wealth of which drew abject pirates and plunderers like Columbus to compete to seek a way there was warped, like so many others, into a ‘third world’ society (later, the World Bank and the IMF, eminent tools of empire, would assist in sealing its doom, for decades after WWII, until its latter-day , even meteoric , revival, albeit under Neo-Lib auspices).

As with Warren Hastings, Viceroy of Brit India, writing calmly back to the Crown reporting the inordinately high profits from the engineered famine in Bengal(which starved millions to death).

Both the Brit General (op. cit) and the Viceroy had only discharged their respective duties: like that member of Minneapolis ‘law enforcement’.

Lord Macaulay, one of the architects of British India, wrote a glowing bio of Robert Clive – Bandit Chief, and Servant of the East India Company , who went from rags to riches in a few years in India, like the lot of them – where he lauds him, more or less, as an ‘officer and a gent’, in recognition , obviously, of his impressive country-wide thuggery.

Just as an example.

They grew opium in India , as peasants starved for lacking food crops, and dumped it in China – against its express will – demoralizing and distorting that rich Jewel of the Orient, which has only now, in the 21st century recovered from that shock.

India, I fear, remains yet in something of a stupor, so deep were the wounds inflicted on it.


There are No Reparations possible for the historic crimes of the Anglo-Norman Empire(s).

Enough resources , to scale, simply do not exist.

In WW II alone, the saturation bombing of Dresden, the ghastly obliteration of most of N. Korea, and the dropping of nuclear devices on Japanese civilians: these are all egregious Crimes against Humanity.

This is no less true of their several fellow Euros – who now don a soft ‘social democratic’ guise – with Belgium leading the wretched Rogue’s Gallery, of a long list of like-minded European Nations, in terms of its outrageous atrocities in Africa in past History.

Leopold’s statues are coming down now: but that is far too little, far too late.

And NATO has also been at it since its inception , undeterred either by conscience or the UN Charter.

Look up their recent misdeeds in Africa and West Asia to know their scroll of honor.

That’s ‘western civ’ , in a nutshell: as experienced by its Victims.

These transgressions are not in some ancient history, it must be recalled, when the ‘rule of law’ may be presumed not to exist, but in the history of the Modern period, with the dissembling ideology of human betterment loudly parroted by the very conquistadores that ravaged , pitilessly, the non-European world.

And they haven’t altogether desisted, from any of it, to date.

By the way I have mentioned only the abominations of their public policy , as conducted by their governments (btw, today, as should be clear, all the so-called ‘multilaterals’ – UN, World Bank, WTO, WHO, et. al. – more or less, serve the Empire: on pain of being defunded).

Bring in the malefactions of their private Corporates (from the East India Company to Monsanto) and you get the full picture.

No wonder the sun never set on the Brit Empire.

As someone has quipped, even God didn’t trust the English in the dark.


Not that the US comes off one whit cleaner.

They strafed, bombed, and napalmed the daylights out of millions of innocents in Indo- China, possibly amongst the greatest war crimes of modern history – to which there is no one to hold them accountable.

And , none deterred, they followed this up with drone bombing civilians in Western Asia, with a bomb being dropped , non-stop, roughly every 12 minutes , to this day.

Consider that.

The truth is indefeasible.

Britain and the US remain premier scofflaw nations that break the very mold of the scofflaw nation: and have been so , uninterruptedly, for centuries.

It takes a titanic scale of carnage it would seem, to claim, and hold aloft, the banner of ‘egalite’ and ‘liberte’ : and to earn the credentials to preach the dissimulating drivel of ‘human rights’ to the world.

So please.

Spare us all the, nauseating, kindergarten sop of the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Human Rights.

They lived that down a (very) long time ago.


Ethnic chauvinism is to be found most everywhere, if in varying degrees.

But Anglo-Normans took it to stellar heights: indeed, whom do they not hate!!!

Yet, is their hate list most selective.

Germans, Russians, Chinese…

In effect, they hate anyone who can compete with them effectively: and only despise those who cannot.

I don’t need to draw up that latter list.

No, there is not much to choose between these two strains of the Late Modernist Empires.

Is there?

Actually, you knew I was putting you on.

Two empires?

They are really one and the same Empire.

The Anglo-Norman Empire.

One is just the Mark II version of the original.

At its current, Caligula, stage of Decay.


Britain, sans empire, reverted to its pathetic origins, in 1945, when its empire was lost, until the City of London (which rigs the price of gold , and interest rates, for most of the world ), in league with Big Brother across the pond , revived it again to a modest status by turning it into a strategic base for their , conjoint, imperial ambitions.

The US, today, appears in the throes of a similar decline, though largely self-inflicted than caused by any machination of its rivals.

The post-WWII power of the US has lain, simply, in its ability to print , at will, the world’s reserve currency , free of cost.

When that privilege goes, they go – notwithstanding the trillion dollar military , the 1000+ bases, and the throttling sanctions (8000+, in 2019) they have, willy nilly, imposed on others (costing, to cite just one instance, 250,000 lives of Iraqi children).

In the interim, the 21st century giants, India, China, Russia and Brazil, are slowly, finding their feet: and the second half of this century belongs, indisputably, to them.


Whether they perform any better than the West, in the future, as good global citizens, remains to be seen.

I am no apologist for them , either.

But the stage is set for cataclysmic alterations of the status quo.

The tables , finally, are starting to turn.


Put bluntly, there is no getting round the fact that were it not for the EU and the US, the world would be , more or less, a relatively peaceable place today (even aside from the dual hazards of Covid and Climate Change).

But their supernal greed and werewolf power-lust have brought the planet to the very edge of collapse.

Empire and Civilisation , in a human society, necessarily stand at opposite poles.

When Euros(incl the US) slough off Empire – as they must, at some point – they, too, can resume construction of a genuine ‘western civ’ , that is worthy of respect.

And one that is more than skin-deep: you know what I mean.

Right now, sad to say, they appear far from it.

But we ex-colonials wish them well in that endeavour, as/if/when they are ready to commence it.

Maybe their reality, one day, might yet live up to the fanciful fairy tales?

Why not?

Change is, always, possible: even, at times, as an unintended consequence.


So , what’s the cultural difference between Britain and the US, if any, as two wings of the Anglo-Norman empire?

I will answer, via allusion, and trope (maybe semi-seriously?).

Britain has at least two civilizing influences operating within (one drawn from its working class, other from its erstwhile aristocratic governors) : Pink Floyd and Cricket.

Yes, cricket, the game of cricket.

America does not.

The minute the US starts tuning in (more) to Pink Floyd, and playing (more) cricket , it will begin to shed its barbarism.

It might even begin to take to drinking tea.

And give up its penchant for watching Pro Wrestling.

Pou quoi, you ask?

Because , from the one it could learn trace elements of civility, from the other intimations of pacifism.


We could call that a start?

Even if it moved no further than the UK, at the end of it.

On the other hand, the US may have a slight edge.

It, almost always, does the right thing.

Yes, it is true.

It does do the right thing..

If only after completely exhausting , wholly, and totally, every other available Alternative.


The above is not my insight: it is (falsely) attributed to Churchill.

There’s a grain of truth to it (despite the attributed source).

For It has a dour, hard-bitten, harsh, pitiless, ruling elite, sans any trace of altruism, or generosity.

Like so many settler-colonial states.

But what choice do we hoi polloi have?

We have to be thankful (even hopeful?) for small , even minor, blessings, under the circs.


[© R.Kanth 2020]   


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda,, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

Toward Transcendence: The Way Forward

[A desperately brief Critique of Euro-Modernism* (EM) and a bare Outline of The Alternative]

(For Noam Chomsky)

By Rajani Kanth

I will make this piece short and simple.
The times call for such economies of style.
We need now to have done with the genre of immanent critiques, where we rock to and fro, endlessly, w/out getting anyplace.
Besides, old recipes, old formulas , old panaceas, have no place now.
It is, as so many of us sense, a New Game.
And it is time for Change.
BIG Change.
Indeed, it is time now , I think, for Transcendence (the antipode of immanent critiques): rising above/beyond routine, ‘authorised’ , modes of discourse.
Put differently, the Left, Right and Centre versions of EM theorising simply keep us locked in to the same otiose paradigm, from which there is No Exit.
There has been a new Physics for almost a century now.
A new Biology for but a few odd years: Epigenetics.
But we still retain the old, antiquated, Social Theory.
Modeled , if understandably, after the materialism of Classical Physics (Yes, so-called ‘social science’ was engendered in the spirit of Physics-Envy).
Time to jettison that baggage.
In its Entirety.
It is not only archaic, it is wrong, categorically, judged by the canons of Q. Physics.
Darwin’s idea of mutations finds relevance here.
He saw mutations as random.
And many are.
But some are not.
Some are ‘purposive’, in the minimal sense of restoring balance.
We are, likely, going through such a shift.
We humans have radically skewed Nature’s rude and rough balances, over a very long time: but far more precipitously in recent times.
Since WWII , over 60% of animal and plant life, even a higher percentage of large mammals, has vanished.
We have exhausted more planetary resources in that same short span of time than in all of human history.
Nature is, in a sense, now ‘intervening’ (or ‘reacting’).
But one must not read too much into that word (I am no fan of ‘new age’ fantasies).
I do not use it in any anthropic sense.
Let me illustrate.
Water finds its own level.
One might see it as seeking a certain ‘balance’, in its spread.
However, it does not ‘choose”, but follows its inherent properties.
So is Nature , following her own Logos, morphing her varied forces (and they bid fair to check our pretensions).
But we are different: we can, self-consciously, Choose.
Descartes said: I think therefore I am.
The Buddha, a far more accomplished philosopher, albeit 2 millenia prior, provided the needful.
He said: as/what you think, you are: and you become.
So, all change , when not the chance accident of history, begins in the mind.
The Collective mind.
And the Choice is clear: either we change, or Nature must suffer a disruption of Evolution.
She, apparently, is unready to suspend her long-delved plans.
So, either we Change , or we Go.
Climate change (as but one mechanism) will see to the latter.
Maybe, even regardless of what we do.
There is some paradox to this.
At one remove, she is not apart from us , but works through us.
Yet, she is the macrocosm , of which we are but sub-entities; so hers is the larger mind.
And her secrets are not always shared, readily, with us.
We need now to Reorient Life.
Here, but a few clues.
They will suffice: a word to the wise , they say , is sufficient.
We need to divest ourselves from this onerous fetish of incessant consumption and production.

Radically alter our methods/instruments in both domains (no mass production, no mass consumption).
Possessive, Asocial Individualism – the very (EM) scourge of our current history – needs be junked.
The Profit-motive, retired: it has served its historical use, if any.
The Adversarial Society, abandoned.
Competition, Monopoly, and Economic activity tied to, led by, Private gain, abrogated.
The Nation-State dissolved.
From Gesellschaft forms of organization we need to return, again, to Gemeinschaft forms, which is how we began.
Abjuring the spurious universalisms of globalization (ploys only for control and marketing) we have to relocate ourselves in face-to-face social relations, within a local culture – of ‘little’ traditions – of our own making, and within our own controls.
But, as I will imply, none of the above require any mass effort to topple the system.
Rather is it a matter of erosion of its principal , ideational, supports.
EuroModernist (EM) societies are engineered, artificial constructs, organized, historically, from above, by the machinations of commerce , capital, and empire.
They are NOT human societies.
They are rationalist, cold, uncaring, and mechanistic.
We are , au contraire, caring, feeling, organic, beings.
Classical Socialism failed because it did not raze that foundation.
The USSR – for all of its many successes, which must not be forgotten – still pursued the grail of GDP, no less avidly than its Capitalist counterparts.
But a bigger bowl of Goulash simply doesn’t cut it.
It does not answer to that primal cri de couer that animates our bosoms.
We have to realign, rebond, with our kith and kin (no matter how defined).
Rediscover our quashed norms of Affective Society.
Antic values: of Hearth and Home.
And re-embrace the basic joy(s) of our kind: Convivialism.
And know who we are, as a species.
Co-operative, caring, familial, and co-respective.
This is a far cry from how EM ideology views us.
The real scarce resource is not time, nor money : but love.
For we are Lovers, in short, rather than law-givers, conquerors, colonisers, and adventurers.
Or, calculating, canny, crafty , hucksters.
Time it is to bid farewell to the nostrums of Hobbes and Smith.
Doing was thrust upon us by the exploitative wiles of rulers and conquerors, and turned into a social value.
Becoming is a EuroModernist mantra, the talisman of accumulationist drives.
So much so that some religions/political traditions, took ‘labor’ itself as a commandment of morality and virtue (Arbeit Macht Frei) rather than a temporary nuisance to be swiftly performed and relinquished.
No, Labor is not the choice avenue to social Virtue (as in some variants of Protestant thinking).
It is drudgery, and worse: when performed involuntarily, and by force.
Arbeit Macht Frei?
Tell that to the Bushmen(and women).
All that Utopian thinking that followed the EM revolutions was, objectively, a waste of social energy.
And also caused a lot of irreparable harm.
But it was unavoidable: in recoiling from the dehumanization(s) of the latter, it showed up their manifold shortcomings.
Society had been turned upside down by the latter forces , so these idealists hoped to ‘re-engineer’ it : toward a better state of being.
Wishful thinking, at best: but who can blame them?
They meant well: but had not a clue about the ineluctable realities of human anthropology.
Lacking that, they borrowed their ideas, in that domain, of from either religion (Judeo-Christian ideology) or political theory (e..g., so-called ‘social contract’ ideas).
Which was to err grievously.
For we don’t need Utopia as Invention: we simply need to Rediscover it.
Nor can we simply , willy nilly, invent slogans, coin lofty declarations, and codify master plans for a New World: and expect human nature to conform to it.
We are programmed to live, tribally (parse that as kindred/community based) , in a joyful state (in Being, not Becoming, or Doing).
We are Mammals, Heat-seeking rather than Light-seeking.
Our greatest Human Need may simply be: to Huddle.
That is our species-being, our social DNA.
It can still be found , albeit now in remote parts of a world thoroughly ravished by EM ideology and praxis.
But it is also deep within us, and easy to locate: IF we can shuffle off the coils of religious and political shibboleths that hold us in thrall.
Our eternal ‘home’ is the humblest of societal units: the human family, at once natural and social.
Note that it meets not one single, vaunted, E-Modernist criterion.
It is not free, individualist, equal, nor democratic.
Wrap your head around that last sentence.
Not once, but twice.
Yet, it gives to us what we crave the most: a haven, refuge, and sanctuary.
What extra-terrestrial ‘heaven’ , conjured up by the tendentious fantasies of religious bigotry, could hope, even remotely, to compare with that?
Bears thinking.
You get the point (I hope).
We are natural, instinctual beings: an idea anathema to EM postulates, which prefers to see us as automatons who can take on any shape and form as per requirements of the ruling ethos , ideology. and political agenda.
Instincts are granted in the study of animals, but not permitted to intrude into the study of the ‘sovereign of creation’, i.e. , MAN (gender intended, in the original EM docket).
That came straight from Judeo-Christian ideas, where we are cast in the image of the Creator, until Darwin interrupted that chain of argument.
So we need to remind ourselves, again, lest we forget, in our hubris.
For all our pretensions, We are Apes.
Chimps and Bonobos, our closest cousins, have definable traits: so have we.
So, think.
And disburden yourself of repressive, ideological, chains that diminish you , and erode your energies.
For, as/what you think, you become.
And discover the rich troves of the Affective Life -lavish, abundant – you have ignored, or suppressed, for being stuck on the Wheel , ever since you can recall.
That is our real, imperishable, wealth.
The Virus has just given some of us the time/opportunity for some reflection on such matters.
Employ it well.
And get off the treadmill – of endless, unrequiting, toil – soon as you can.
After all, you are not , if you are reading this, a hamster.
We have been hoodwinked, forced, duped, and systematically misled, into thinking of ourselves in dystopian, sub-human, and asocial terms.
We have, in short, been forced to live a lie.
Contrast , in your thinking, how you live ,and function, to who we/you are, on the inside.
The rest will follow, as day follows night.
Let me repeat that.
Seek simply to Know Yourself : (all) necessary changes will, then, ensue.
We have been , alas, deceived by fine words.
One of the many unstated functions of language (which may well be a primary one) is concealment of motives.
Language is an indispensable aid to dissembling.
W/out that guileful artefact, our feelings, as humans, are all too easy to comprehend , requiring no interpreters.
Complexity of language is often associated with high density of oppression and exploitation.
No wonder elites monopolise language (Latin, in Rome, Sanskrit in ancient Vedic society)
And both religion and politics utilize language, to repressive effect.
Note that I am not outlining a nouvelle manifesto, in the classic EM mode of ‘we can be anything we wish to be’.
Instead , I am suggesting that our contentment lies in effortless conformity to our anthropic species being.
So it requires no force, no mass movements, no marches, no revolutions.
Nor even consulting learned tomes of deep philosophy.
Simply an internal, personal recognition of the obvious, based on reflection alone.
And it will be found to be obvious.
* EM, or EuroModernism , the specific template of Modernism that Europe invented and imposed on the world, consisted of , in my rendition: a very selective faith in a self-defined, triumphalist , reductionist, Science; a tendentious, self- serving belief in ‘progress’ ; a rampant philosophy of materialism; and an abiding conviction that no cost was too high, societal, military, or ecological, to impose this world-view, by force, on Others. It imposed the Restless Society on us all, ever discontented, ever transformational, sacrificing Being to Becoming. Understood, with care, it covers both the Tweedledum and Tweedledee Idylls of EM vintage: Capitalism and Socialism.


Kanth, R . Farewell to Modernism: On Human Devolution in the Twenty-First Century, NY: Peter Lang, 2017
[© R.Kanth 2020]

Share Button


By Rajani Kanth

Come, Let us


The Holy Time’s

before us:

And this


May not last –

Come, Let us



All the


Warn us

No Returning

To what is

Past –


The Feast

Was Exorbitant:

Cakes and Ale

lie in the

Waters cast –

So , come,

let us fast


The Antic

Gods do

rave and fume

Their Patience

will not last






giddy, spin

too fast –

Night moon’s


in storm clouds


Party’s over,

Done ,

and Past

It’s Time:

To Pray,

and Fast




The Good


Bounty –

a Largesse,


and Vast


In Euphoria

That Nature –

She Bats

Last –


So, Expiating


In Exculpating

Piety –

Come, Let us


[© R.Kanth 2020]   


Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda,, A Day in the Life, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

Share Button

Tweets From Bill McKibben

billmckibben 23 hours agoImportant new campaign from @350_US--America's central bank could play a huge role in reining in the rogue oil comp… https://t.co/gb2YhjXNGi

Erika Raskin

  • No items found in feed URL: http://erikaraskin.net/feed/. You requested 1 items.
    • Love’s Denouement

    • By Rajani Kanth


      The dullest


      doth True


      discern  –


      Though  Sirens

      Will   perjure

      And   Furies

      Still   Burn –


      And so

      the  sweet


      Of Heaven’s

      Soft  gaze –


      Does  all

      Ills   resolve:

      all  Miscues

      Erase –


      So, though


      may we yet

      go down –




      or   fey,

      foolish ,





      of   fresh

      daisies –


      past recall,

      or renown


      So, ask not

      Why those

      Gay flowers

      Bloom –



      The fair


      Of our deep



      [©R.Kanth, 2019]  


      Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda, and Expiations, is Trustee of the World Peace Congress

      Share Button
    • Traits

    • The head’s
      with Reasons
      Too multifarious
      To know

      The heart only
      Two Seasons:
      The high and the

      No neutral
      It takes

      But all that
      it feels:
      Cleaves –
      Or forsakes

      O the head
      is so
      The heart,

      But O what
      A difference
      That dissimilitude
      Makes !

      [© R.Kanth 2018] 
      Professor Rajani Kanth is the author of Coda, and Expiations
      and trustee of the World Peace Congress

      Share Button
    • Song for Ahed

    • By Rajani Kanth


      Ahed Tamimi

      Stood , Fearless,

      up to Power –


      A mere


      become Heroine

      Of the Hour


      Yes, she was



      Her mettle,

      Sore tested –


      Sure, Defiance,

      Was bought at

      High Cost


      But that should

      Not faze us –


      Rather, amaze



      At   Sixteen,

      She ,  the

      One War –

      Zion Has Lost

      [©R.Kanth 2018] 

      Professor Rajani Kanth, Author of Coda, and Expiations
      Trustee; World Peace Congress

      Share Button
    • Meet the National Book Foundation’s 5 Under 35

    • s-li

      Excerpted from the LA Times, September 29, 2016

      The National Book Foundation, which presents the National Book Awards, launched its 5 Under 35 program in 2006 to highlight the work of young literary talents; this year each writer gets a $1,000 cash prize and will be invited to participate in public readings.

      Many past 5 Under 35 honorees have gone on to further acclaim. Nam Le’s short story collection “The Boat” won the international Dylan Thomas Prize; Tea Obreht’s novel “The Tiger’s Wife” took the Orange Prize for fiction; and two honorees, Dinaw Mengestu and Karen Russell, were each later awarded MacArthur Fellowships….9781941861301-JacketGray.indd

      One of those writers this year is S. Li, who took up creative writing as a hobby when he was in medical school. The 31-year-old neurologist’s debut novel, “Transoceanic Lights,” was published by Harvard Square Editions, a small independent press.

      “I had sent the book to the National Book Foundation for consideration for the National Book Awards, fully knowing that my chances were zero,” Li said from his home in Burlington, Mass. When he received the email informing him he’d been chosen as an honoree, “I thought it was a scam. And then I realized it wasn’t. I had no idea this was even in the cards.”

      Li’s novel, about a Chinese immigrant family, is based on his own childhood. He was 5 years old when his family moved from Guangzhou, China, to Boston.

      img-41“I was sort of teaching myself the craft of writing,” Li said of his years writing fiction while also learning medicine. “And so it just made natural sense to go with material that comes easiest to you, and that’s your childhood.”

      Li is one of two immigrants honored in this year’s program. Yaa Gyasi, author of the critically acclaimed novel “Homegoing,” was born in Ghana and moved with her family to the United States when she was 2. [more]



      Share Button
    • What are the best eco books for children and teens?

    • @EmilyDrabs, excerpted from The Guardian,


      Authors including David Almond, Frank Cottrell Boyce and Katherine Rundell plus teen site members share the books that made them think more deeply about climate change and environmental themes. Now share yours!

      This week we’re celebrating the positive power of stories, all kinds of stories, to bring home what we risk losing on our beautiful planet – and what we can do about it. Here authors and children’s books site members share the books that made them think. We’ll be feeding this blog with more recommendations all week, so please share yours – and keep checking back.

      Frank Cottrell Boyce (whose latest book is the remarkably green The Astounding Broccoli Boy)

      First book of Saints

      The book that made me realise that I was part of the environment was The Ladybird Book of Saints. On the cover was this brilliant image of St Francis releasing the caged birds he had he had bought in the market. For ages afterwards I would go into pet shops and zoos and itch to unlock the doors. In fact there are “freeing the animals” scenes in at least two of my books. There are so many environmental messages about how horrible humans are wrecking the planet – that’s obviously true in a way but this image made me feel that I belonged in the World too and that I could cherish and love it.

      David Almond, author of Skellig

      The Promise by Nicola Davies and Laura Carlin. It’s beautifully written, beautifully illustrated picture book. It shows a troubled darkened world being recreated by the human need for greenery, life and colour.

      Louise O’Neill, author of Only Ever Yours

      Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake is a speculative fiction novel that is very much concerned with the damage humans are inflicting upon the environment and the possible catastrophic results that could have. Written in 2003, many plot points now seem eerily prescient and it makes for a disturbing, powerful read. Highly recommended for older teenagers.

      Site member, Patrick

      Carl Hiaasen’s Hoot is true to its name in that it’s a supremely funny YA novel, and one that tends to be overlooked. There’s a real environmental streak running through all of Hiaasen’s works and Hoot is no exception, it deals with a Florida teen who bands together with a couple of new friends to stop the destruction of a burrowing owl colony. It’s a lot of fun with a solid conservationist message at its core and an abundance of charm to boot.”

      Candy Gourlay, author of Shine

      Long ago I wrote a short story called How to Build the Perfect Sandcastle for Under the Weather, the climate change anthology edited by Tony Bradman. About a white sand beach losing its sand because the sea is heating up … the same hot oceans that later whipped up the murderous monster that was Typhoon Haiyan in 2013.

      Perhaps the all too real climate change disaster in the Philippines has made me partial to flood stories. My favorite is Not the End of the World, the lyrical resetting of Noah’s Ark as a Tsunami survival story by Geraldine McCaughrean.

      Lottie Longshanks, site member

      The wild series by Piers Torday. So far I have read The Last Wild and The Dark Wild. Kester has the unusual gift of communicating with animals and it is his mission to save the animals from red eye the disease that is slowly killing them. It is a really exciting story and you soon guess who the villains are Selwyn Stone and his lackeys who want to dictate the way that everyone lives. The amazing rubbish dump in the second book in the series really makes you think about the damage that we are doing to our planet. I can’t wait to read the third book in the series,The Wild Beyond.

      White Dolphin by Gill Lewis Set in the south West of England the exciting story tells of children who take on the might of a powerful fishing business to stop dredging in the harbour because of the damage it does to marine life. I also love Moon Bear by Gill Lewis. This incredibly moving story shows how deforestation leads to misery for the animals whose habitat was the forest. And finally here is a recommendation for small children I read it to my cousin who lives in Oman when he comes to visit us. Dear Greenpeace by Simon James. Emily writes to Greenpeace to find out how to care for the whale that she thinks she has seen in her pond. Emily’s letters and the lovely replies she receives from Greenpeace will give little children a lot of information about whales. (Also see Lottie Longshank’s poem Our Precious world)

      SF Said, author of Varjak Paw

      I recommend Exodus by Julie Bertagna: a brilliantly prescient YA novel about climate change, set in a drowned future world. It’s full of unforgettable visions and characters, and it will stay with you forever!

      ItWasLovelyReadingYou, site member

      My book would be Breathe by Sarah Crossan. It made me think about how we take so many things for granted, such as oxygen. You can’t see it, we use it every day, without it we would not survive; yet many people do not really sit down and feel a sense of gratitude for these types of things, becuase we assume we deserve them, we see them as something that will never go away, we just accept it without question. Breathe really made me feel a sense of ‘imagine if we didn’t have oxygen, or we had limited supplies of it-”, it made me question my unconscious detachment from what keeps us alive, and really feel privelidged to have all of these necessities.

      Katherine Rundell, author of Rooftoppers

      Cosmic, by Frank Cottrell Boyce. Cosmic is a book that makes the world look like something worth protecting. It’s hilariously funny, and also wise – it makes its readers want desperately to go into space, but also to take care of the world while we’re on it. The Earth is, as one of the astronauts says, “some kind of lovely.” The Last Wild series by Piers Torday – these three spectacular books are about a world decimated by humans, and the possibility of that loss feels very real and urgent and frightening – and they’re also fantastic adventure stories, about bravery and animals and human capacity to do huge good as well as harm. And there’s a bossy talking cockroach.

      Site Brahmachari, author of Kite Spirit and Artichoke Hearts

      For me it has to be The Ring of Bright Water Trilogy by Gavin Maxwell. I fell in love with these books as a child because they are set on the West coast of Scotland – a place I love – where wildlife and nature are the biggest characters. It;s a humbling landscape. If you have a love of the outdoors and really want to study the nature of beautiful, playful otters… and can stand to have your heart broken …. you should read these stories. Although they were written 50 years ago they are as timeless as the shingle beaches they are set on. The author lived and breathed the paradise he went to live in… and so will you when you read these books… and afterwards you can watch the film (tissues at the ready!)

      OrliTheBookWorm, site member

      Breathe by Sarah Crossan is probably the book that’s impacted me the most in terms of the environment – it’s a dystopian novel, with people living in domes due to a lack of oxygen – the raw descriptions and harsh realities were wonderfully done and uttery thought provoking, and made me take a step away from my laptop and have a look outside my window…. It’s a brilliant book, which I guarantee will change your perspective on the environment around us.

      Piers Torday, author of The Dark Wild trilogy

      The Animals of Farthing Wood by Colin Dann – the original classic tale of a group of British animals seeking refuge when their precious Farthing Wood is threatened by human development. They overcome incredible obstacles and danger to make it to a wildlife sanctuary. But reading it today there is an extra poignancy – some of the animals in the story, like the red-backed shrike, are now extinct, and others – like the adder, hare and voles – are all under threat.

      BritishBiblioholic, site member

      Watership Down by Richard Adams – When the rabbits in Watership Down are forced to leave their home, it is due to its impending destruction by humans. This potentially can be seen as an allegory for the ongoing destruction for the environment in general – and unlike the rabbits, if we don’t save our environment, we won’t be able to find somewhere else to live.


      Mary, curator, eco-fiction.com

      Memory of Water by Emmi Itäranta: The novel takes place in the future after climate change has ravished economies and ecologies, and made fresh water scarce. The main character, Noria, is a young woman learning the traditional, sacred tea master art from her father. Yet, water is rationed and scarce in her future world. Her family has a secret spring of water, and, as tea masters, she and her father act as the water’s guards, even though what they are doing is a crime according to their future world’s government, a crime strongly disciplined by the military.


      NC front DR TinyNature’s Confession by JL Morin: The eco-novel is wonderful and reminds me of classic science fiction I watched or read as a kid. It was a genre that fascinated me then, and this book has joined that memory. The novel is epic in that it doesn’t just tell a story (which it does do too), but it puts our very survival into question while romping through the universe or discovering new quantum physics that are both scientific and spiritual in nature. In the meantime, universal symbols are unearthed, codes are investigated, fat corporations are dominating, a romance is blossoming, computers come alive, and native tribes and Nature on another planet bring our own treasured past into the future.


      Tito intiro Chavaropana by Jessica Groenendijk: Tito intiro Chavaropana means ‘Tito and the Giant Otter’ in Matsigenka. The author, a biologist who has studied giant otters, is now working on a sequel, in which Tito sets off into the forest to hunt a spider monkey and meets a harpy eagle on the way. They become friends but not without a misunderstanding or two!
      61cwBitpcAL._AA160_Spirit Bear by Jennifer Harrington: Spirit Bear celebrates a rare and iconic black bear that is born with a recessive gene that makes its coat creamy or white. Also called the Kermode bear, the spirit bear lives in the delicate, rich, and threatened ecosystem of the Great Bear Rainforest in British Columbia, Canada. Jennifer’s story is about the journey of a spirit bear cub that gets lost from his mother and has to find his way back.

      Share Button
    • Publisher Guidelines

    • Publisher Harvard Square Editions is looking for literary fiction of environmental or social significance.

      Its mission is to publish fiction that transcends national boundaries, especially manuscripts that are international, political, literary, sci-fi, fantasy, utopia and distopia. Send submissions of aesthetic value and constructive social or political content, especially manuscripts related to climate change, deforestation, and conservation.

      Share Button
    • A Moral Atmosphere: Hypocrisy redefined for the age of warming

    • By Bill McKibben (HC ’82)

      This article first appeared in Orion Magazine.


      THE LIST OF REASONS for not acting on climate change is long and ever-shifting. First it was “there’s no problem”; then it was “the problem’s so large there’s no hope.” There’s “China burns stuff too,” and “it would hurt the economy,” and, of course, “it would hurt the economy.” The excuses are getting tired, though. Post Sandy (which hurt the economy to the tune of $100 billion) and the drought ($150 billion), 74 percent of Americans have decided they’re very concerned about climate change and want something to happen… (more)
      Share Button
    • Cambridge divest from fossil fuel

    • We call on the City of Cambridge Retirement System to immediately freeze any new investment in fossil fuelcompanies, and to divest from direct ownership and any commingled funds that include fossil fuel public equities and corporate bonds within 5 years (more)

      Share Button

    Around Harvard

    Brain Pickings

    by Ben Mattlin (HC ’84)

      Like all romantic entanglements, the reasons for their tensions—tensions, which eventually led the invisible rubber band between them to snap—weren't quite clear.  Or maybe they were entirely too clear.  Telling me about it, Shane struggled for the right words, but his meaning rang with the clarity of breaking glass. "For a while, she was planning on moving up here to be with me, to be able to help out with all my [...]

    by Teresa Hsiao (HC ’07)

  • No items found in feed URL: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=teresa-hsiao. You requested 1 items.
  • Sheila Connolly (GSA ’79) – Mystery Lovers’ Kitchen


    TylerJamesComicTyler James
    All of a sudden, though, you start stacking ComixTribe, Image, Boom, Action Lab, Valiant, etc... books against Big Two books...
    74 months ago
    we smell like coffee and old libraries filled with new books waiting to be read
    74 months ago
    aidanr1022Aidan Ryan
    When Dad has to hit the books in the middle of the day so he can support the fam @emrson11webster http://t.co/igjSlYR8cB
    74 months ago
    forgot my books ?
    74 months ago